Author Archive

RSC Advances Popular Advances Interview with Abdu Saeed

We are very pleased to introduce Dr Abdu Saeed who is the corresponding author of the RSC Advances article, antibacterial activity of the micro and nanostructures of the optical material tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum and its application as an antimicrobial coating. This was well received by reviewers and was handpicked by our handling editors to be part of our Popular Advances collection – a big congratulations to all the authors!

Dr Saeed told us more about the work that went into this study and what he hopes to achieve in the future. You can explore other articles in our 2022 Popular Advances online collection here!

 

Meet the Author:

Abdu Saeed was born in Ibb, Yemen, in 1979. After obtaining two degrees in physics (from Ibb University and Taiz University, respectively) he was selected as a teaching assistant at Thamar University. Afterwards, he pursued an MSc and PhD in applied experimental physics at King Abdulaziz University, Saudia Arabia, where he was selected as the best postgraduate student! Nowadays, Dr Saeed works in multidisciplinary fields including energy, electrical properties, nanotechnology, and polymer science. Currently, Dr Saeed and his group are studying the bio applications of the optical material tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum.

 

Could you briefly explain the focus of your article to the non-specialist and why it is of current interest?
This research focuses mainly on estimating the antibacterial activity of Alq3, but the effect of particle size (micro- and nano- structures) of the Alq3 powders was also investigated. Furthermore, we successfully incorporated this material with polystyrene to form an antibacterial composite for coating purposes.

How big an impact could your results potentially have?
Alq3 is one of the most famous small molecular semiconductors with efficient electroluminescence and fluorescence properties. Since this material was used to manufacture the first OLED, it has been utilized massively in fabricating optoelectrical devices. However, it has not been used in bio applications. Therefore, we think use as an antibacterial coating could bring more interest to Alq3 in bio applications. 

Could you explain the motivation behind this study?
I was studying the toxicity of this material and found two things: Firstly, this material has high toxicity and, when used as a dye for fluorescence bioimaging, the captured images had high fluorescence. These results gave the motivation to utilize this material in new bio applications. Secondly, we spent three months overcoming bacterial contamination in the lab while doing the cell viability experiments. These two things motivated us to study whether Alq3 can be used as an antibacterial agent.

In your opinion, what are the key design considerations for your study?
Alq3 is an attractive and exciting material. It has different crystal structures, and it is considered the most popular organometallic semiconductor in OLED. Its molecular structure has a conjugated π-electron system, which is advantageous for many applications. This material has electroluminescence (EL) and photoluminescence (PL) properties. EL properties make it an excellent material for optoelectronics devices; PL properties make it a good material for optical applications. Its diverse properties and current applications make it an excellent candidate for more investigations into new applications.

Which part of the work towards this paper proved to be most challenging?
We tested the antibacterial activity of the Alq3 samples on seven different human pathogenic bacterial strains representing Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: Escherichia coli ATCC 11775 (EC), Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 (EF), Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883 (KP), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 33591 (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027 (PA), Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 12600 (SA), and Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14028 (ST). Estimating the IC50 for this material against the bacterial strains was the most challenging part of this study.

What aspect of your work are you most excited about at the moment?
We are most excited about using Alq3 in biosensor applications, particularly in bioimaging. We believe that it will be interesting to make modifications, such as using an appropriate material as a surface modifier containing optimized ligands to synthesize Alq3 into a core-shell form. This could further reduce Alq3’s toxicity whilst maintaining its impressive fluorescence.

What is the next step? What work is planned?
We will use what we have achieved to identify and obtain further uses for Alq3. We will study its antifungal activity and incorporate it with suitable polymers for its antifungal tests. Additionally, we hope to check its interaction with different viruses. The first use of Alq3 for bioimaging was by us – we believe there is still much more effort to be made to optimize the use of Alq3 in bioimaging. 

 

Antibacterial activity of the micro and nanostructures of the optical material tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum and its application as an antimicrobial coating

Graphical abstract: Antibacterial activity of the micro and nanostructures of the optical material tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum and its application as an antimicrobial coating

 

Submit to RSC Advances today! Check out our author guidelines for information on our article types or find out more about the advantages of publishing in a Royal Society of Chemistry journal.

Keep up to date with our latest Popular Advances, Reviews, Collections & more by following us on Twitter. You can also keep informed by signing up to our E-Alerts.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

RSC Advances Popular Advances Interview with James Knight

We are excited to introduce Dr James Knight, who is the corresponding author of the RSC Advances article, The influence of degree of labelling upon cellular internalisation of antibody-cell penetrating peptide conjugates. The manuscript was well received by reviewers and was handpicked by our handling editors to be part of our Popular Advances collection.

Dr Knight told us more about the work that went into this paper and what he hopes to achieve in the future. You can explore other articles in our 2022 Popular Advances online collection here!

Meet the Author:

Dr James Knight is lecturer in radiochemistry at the School of Natural and Environmental Sciences at Newcastle University. His research surrounds the synthesis and preclinical evaluation of radiopharmaceuticals for imaging and therapeutic applications. Additionally, he is the Degree Programme Director for MSc Drug Chemistry and the lead for radiochemistry within the Discovery of Medicines research theme in the Faculty of Medical Sciences. Interestingly, he also recently co-authored two textbooks on click chemistry and its role in radiochemistry!

The first author, Toni Pringle, is a PhD student who led the research in this paper!

Could you briefly explain the focus of your article to the non-specialist and why it is of current interest?
In the present era of precision medicine, antibodies have emerged as an important class of highly target-specific therapeutic drugs, particularly in oncology, yet their inefficient cellular internalisation limits their scope of application to disease targets situated on the exterior side of the cell membrane. This article is based on research led by PhD student Toni Pringle who modified Herceptin (an antibody used to treat HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers) with a peptide that confers cell-penetrating properties and examined how the extent of this modification affected the uptake of Herceptin in human breast cancer cells, resulting in data that advances our understanding of the cell-internalising properties of these constructs.

How big an impact could your results potentially have?
The results of our study shine a light on the significant influence of a fundamental molecular design parameter – the degree of cell-penetrating peptide labelling. Notably, we found that a radiolabelled analogue of Herceptin modified with five cell-penetrating peptides had uptake in HER2-expressing cells 14.7-fold higher after 48 hours compared to an equivalent analogue with no peptide modification. The scale of this enhancement is exciting when you consider its implications for enhancing the therapeutic index of antibody-drug conjugates, as well as its potential to expand the scope of antibody-based positron emission tomography imaging agents to include disease biomarkers located in the intracellular environment.

Could you explain the motivation behind this study?
The main focus of our research is the development of radiopharmaceuticals that can be used as imaging and/or therapeutic agents for cancer. We are particularly interested in radiopharmaceuticals based on antibody-cell penetrating peptide conjugates (Ab-CPPs) and our motivation in this case was to understand the extent to which cellular internalisation of cancer target-specific Ab-CPP is affected by the degree of peptide labelling. Our group is keen to expand in this area and we felt it was crucial to get a firm handle on this important parameter.

In your opinion, what are the key design considerations for your study?
To allow us to determine the degree of peptide labelling, we decided to use a bioconjugation strategy based on strain-promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition as this provided a convenient way to measure this parameter by depletion of the alkyne absorbance in the UV region. We also had to think carefully about how to approach the cell-based assays which were fairly complex due to the need to consider several factors, such as the specific activity of the radiolabelled Ab-CPPs, cell numbers and how these would change over the course of the experiment (and how to account for this), the sensitivity of the gamma counter, and of course, radio-protection measures at each stage etc. I must say that Toni did a fabulous job here in the planning and implementation of these experiments.

Which part of the work towards this paper proved to be most challenging?
Working with radioisotopes can be challenging as the agents we put so much effort into making are continually and irretrievably disappearing from the moment we make them! As a result, we have to plan our work very carefully, and often this involves coordinating the activities of several people!

What aspect of your work are you most excited about at the moment?
Radiochemistry and imaging at Newcastle University is thriving and enjoying a period of expansion. The imminent opening of our radiopharmaceutical GMP suite will grant us the ability to readily translate our probes into the clinic, and we have a dedicated network of academics and clinicians supporting us in this endeavour. For me, this is an incredibly exciting prospect!

What is the next step? What work is planned?
We’re taking this forward in two ways. First, we are applying this approach to antibody-drug conjugates to examine the influence of DOL upon therapeutic efficacy in target cell populations. Second, we are developing PET radioligands based on Ab-CPPs to target intracellular biomarkers that arise early in the development of pancreatic cancer to facilitate early detection. In each case, we are applying new, improved cell penetrating peptides. We are looking forward to sharing the results of these investigations soon!

 

The influence of degree of labelling upon cellular internalisation of antibody-cell penetrating peptide conjugates.

Graphical abstract: The influence of degree of labelling upon cellular internalisation of antibody-cell penetrating peptide conjugates

Submit to RSC Advances today! Check out our author guidelines for information on our article types or find out more about the advantages of publishing in a Royal Society of Chemistry journal.

Keep up to date with our latest Popular Advances, Reviews, Collections & more by following us on Twitter. You can also keep informed by signing up to our E-Alerts.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

September 2022 RSC Advances Review Articles

Welcome to September’s Review round up!

Every month we update our 2022 Reviews in RSC Advances collection to showcase all of the review articles published in RSC Advances in 2022. Don’t forget to come back next month to check out our latest reviews.

We hope you enjoy reading and as always, all of our articles are open access so you can easily share your favourites online and with your colleagues.

Explore the full collection!

Browse a selection of our September reviews below:

The diversity and utility of arylthiazoline and aryloxazoline siderophores: challenges of total synthesis
Karolina Kamińska, Andrzej Mular, Evgenia Olshvang, Nils Metzler Nolte, Henryk Kozłowski, Elżbieta Wojaczyńska and Elżbieta Gumienna-Kontecka
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 25284-25322

Optical bio-sensing of DNA methylation analysis: an overview of recent progress and future prospects
Mina Adampourezare, Mohammad Hasanzadeh and Farzad Seidi
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 25786-25806

Synthesis and pharmacological activities of azo dye derivatives incorporating heterocyclic scaffolds: a review
Kibrom Mezgebe and Endale Mulugeta
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 25932-25946

Electrochemical Detection of selected Heavy Metals in Water: a case study of African experiences
Enyioma C. Okpara, Omolola E. Fayemi, Olanrewaju B. Wojuola, Damian C. Onwudiwe and Eno E. Ebenso
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 26319-26361

Nanozyme-based sensors for detection of food biomarkers: a review
Fareeha Arshad, Noor Faizah Mohd-Naim, Rona Chandrawati, Daniel Cozzolino and Minhaz Uddin Ahmed
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 26160-26175

Mechanism and behavior of caffeine sorption: affecting factors
Merve Fakioğlu and Yasemen Kalpaklı
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 26504-26513

Recovery and utilization of crude glycerol, a biodiesel byproduct
Yujia Liu, Biqi Zhong and Adeniyi Lawal
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 27997-28008

Submit to RSC Advances today! Check out our author guidelines for information on our article types or find out more about the advantages of publishing in a Royal Society of Chemistry journal.

Keep up to date with our latest Popular Advances, Reviews, Collections & more by following us on Twitter. You can also keep informed by signing up to our E-Alerts.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

September 2022 Popular Advances Articles

Welcome to September’s Popular Advances article round up!

Every month we update our 2022 RSC Advances Popular Advances Article Collection to showcase all of the articles selected by our reviewers and handling editors as Popular Advances in 2022. Don’t forget to come back next month to check out our latest Popular articles.

We hope you enjoy reading and as always, all of our articles are open access so you can easily share your favourites online and with your colleagues.

Explore the full collection!

Efficient and practical synthesis of monoalkyl oxalates under green conditions
Tatiana Barsukova, Takeyuki Sato, Haruki Takumia and Satomi Niwayama
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 25669-25674

A simple and direct ionic chromatography method to monitor galactose oxidase activity
Eden Kaddouch, Maria E. Cleveland, David Navarro, Sacha Grisel, Mireille Haon, Harry Brumer, Mickaël Lafond, Jean-Guy Berrin and Bastien Bissaro
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 26042-26050

Enhanced transformation of CO2 over microporous Ce-doped Zr metal–organic frameworks
Juan Bai, Ziwei Song, Lijuan Liu, Xu Zhu, Faming Gao and Raghunath V. Chaudhari
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 26307-26318

Stereoselective synthesis of C3-tetrasubstituted oxindoles via copper catalyzed asymmetric propargylation
Jiao-Mei Wang, Yu Zhao, Chang-Sheng Yao and Kai Zhang
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 26727-26732

Synthesis and Hybridizing Properties of P Stereodefined Chimeric [PS]-{DNA:RNA} and [PS]-{DNA:(2’-OMe)-RNA} Oligomers
Katarzyna Jastrzębska, Anna Maciaszek, Rafał Dolot, Agnieszka Tomaszewska-Antczak, Barbara Mikołajczyk and Piotr Guga
RSC Adv., 2022, 12, 26815-26824

Antibacterial activity of the micro and nanostructures of the optical material tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum and its application as an antimicrobial coating
Abdu Saeed, Aysh Y. Madkhli, Rami Adel Pashameah, Noor M. Bataweel, Mir Ali Razvi and Numan Salah
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 27131-27144

The influence of degree of labelling upon cellular internalisation of antibody-cell penetrating peptide conjugates
Toni A. Pringle, Oliver Coleman, Akane Kawamura and James C. Knight
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 27716-27722

One-pot synthesis of chromenes in the presence of nano-cellulose/Ti(IV)/Fe3O4 as natural-based magnetic nano-catalysts under solvent free conditions
Raziyeh Gholami, Abdolhamid Bamoniri and Bi Bi Fatemeh Mirjalili
RSC Adv., 2022,12, 27555-27563

Submit to RSC Advances today! Check out our author guidelines for information on our article types or find out more about the advantages of publishing in a Royal Society of Chemistry journal.

Keep up to date with our latest  Popular Advances articles, Reviews, Collections & more by following us on Twitter. You can also keep informed by signing up to our E-Alerts.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Advancing with Advances – How to publish and not perish (Part 9): Publishing Tips from an Academic Editor

Would you read your own manuscript?

The importance of honesty and integrity in publishing.

This week’s advice is courtesy of Dr Fabienne Dumoulin, who discusses many reasons why manuscripts can be rejected without review. Fabienne reminds us of the principal purpose of publishing: collaboration and sharing to ensure advancement of the scientific community.

Meet the editor:

Dr Fabienne Dumoulin, Associate Editor and Editorial Board Member for RSC Advances, works in the Department of Biomedical Engineering of Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University. Her research interests surround phthalocyanines, co photodynamic therapy, molecular materials, and nanomedicine.

Dr Fabienne Dumoulin, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University

  1. What is the most common reason for rejecting a manuscript without review?

‘There are several reasons to pre-screen a manuscript and desk-reject it.

Very rarely, because the journal scope is rather large, a manuscript can be rejected because there really is no chemistry. A complete biological work on a molecule or material that is already published and without reference to the role of its structure wouldn’t fit in RSC Advances. This is rare, but it happens.

What is really crucial is the solidity of science. Are the characterizations complete and reliable? In line with the journal guidelines? Is the experimental part accurate? Copy-paste are often used during its preparation, but I’ve seen materials and methods sections citing characterization equipment that are not used in the description of the reported materials or molecules.

Declaring a paper as incremental and rejecting it on this basis is more subjective, but we can see some (a minority of) authors submitting manuscript with nearly the same figures because the same measurements are made, with the same organization of works, the molecules or materials being only slightly different from what is already available in the literature by the same authors. Here come the different between what is novel/new and what is scientifically interesting.

Even more subjective is the impact criteria. It is partially related to the incremental one! Simple example: if we know how a molecule with a hexyl chain behaves, no need to publish the same with an octyl chain if no significant difference(s) in the properties are observed. Or use of a different cell line? but nothing new? That would also prompt a desk-rejection.

Finally, we are trained on detecting paper milled manuscripts, and assisted by the fantastic editorial publishing team of the journal!

  1. What is the best piece of advice you could give a submitting author?

Write and submit a paper you would like to read, as a reviewer and as a scientist!

Remember that beyond the need to publish dictated by annual performance evaluation and funding applications, the first purpose of scientific publication is to SHARE SCIENCE and SHARE SCIENTIFIC DATA to help the other actors of the field moving forward.

Like: I’ve tried this, it does work, or this works better, no need to repeat the experiment, rather use this information as it may prompt new topics/procedures/experiments/hypotheses, open new horizons, avoid reproducing dead ends.

Also, your manuscript must give a feeling of trust and confidence. Present solid characterization and experimental part. Spectra must be complete (always start the scale of your NMR spectra at zero please…), as must be the microphotographs of gels. When only a part of an electrophoresis gel is of interest for the discussion, it is fine to put only this part in the paper, but then present the whole picture in the supporting information for the sake of reliability (and refer to it in the caption of the manuscript figure!). Otherwise, it raises a red flag!

Figures must be well readable, without useless colors and effects.

Be rigorous, homogeneous, and coherent.

Be honest. You’ve submitted your paper to another journal? Specify it in the submission system if it is an RSC journal, in all cases in the cover letter. Explain why you believe it will fit well in RSC Advances despite this previous rejection.

And, please, please, please discuss your results. Unexpected observation? Mention it, explain why it is unexpected, why it is important, contextualize with the existing data and the expectations when you designed and conceived the works.

We hope that you find these insights from useful while writing your next paper!

Tune in next week for more Advancing with Advances!

You are welcome to send in any questions you have about peer-review or publishing to advances-rsc@rsc.org or post them on Twitter @RSCAdvances #AdvancingWithAdvances.

Don’t miss out on our previous tips on how to publish and not perish below:

Advancing with Advances (Part 1): featuring Professor Robert Baker (Trinity College Dublin)

Advancing with Advances (Part 2): featuring editorial insights from staff editors at RSC Advances

Advancing with Advances (Part 3): featuring Professor Brenno A.D. Neto (Universidade de Brasília, Brazil) Dr. Donna Arnold (University of Kent, UK), and Professor Nestor Mariano Correa (Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto, Argentina)

Advancing with Advances (Part 4): featuring Professor Megan O’Mara (Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology), Dr Giacomo Saielli (University of Padova, Italy), and Dr Pablo Denis (Universidad de la Republica Oriental del Uruguay)

Advancing with Advances (Part 5): featuring Professor Franck Dumeignil (University of Lille, France) Professor Xi Chen (Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China), and Professor Manojit Pal (Dr Reddy’s Institute of Life Sciences, India)

Advancing with Advances (Part 6): featuring Dr. Ranjit Koodali (Western Kentucky University, USA), Professor Luigi Vaccaro ( University of Perugia, Italy), and Professor Thierry Ollevier, (Université Laval, Québec Canada)

Advancing with Advances (Part 7): featuring Professor Steven McIntosh, Lehigh University, Pennsylvania, USA and Dr. Lubomír Rulíšek, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague

Advancing with Advances (Part 8): featuring Professor Leyong Wang, Nanjing University, China, and Professor Pucci, University of Pisa, Italy.

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)