Archive for the ‘Green Chemistry at 25’ Category

Green Chemistry 25th Anniversary Collection: Green liquid marble-based hydrogels as pesticidal pyrethrin slow-release carriers

Over the past 25 years, Green Chemistry has provided a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative sustainable technologies, efficient utilisation of resources and the concomitant minimisation of waste. We are delighted to bring together a very special issue containing articles by members of the green chemistry community as well as past and present Green Chemistry Board members, to mark and celebrate our first 25 years.

Among the contributions to this themed collection is a Paper on a strategy to prepare hydrogel drug slow-release carriers for efficient mosquito larvae extermination using green biodegradable materials. (DOI: 10.1039/D3GC03625A).

This strategy provides a new way to expand the application of liquid marbles in green chemistry. The highly stable, highly loaded, and biodegradable slow-release hydrogel carrier was prepared based on liquid marble utilizing green and cheap materials for loading pyrethrin to kill mosquito larvae. The liquid marble endowed the drug carrier with superior floating stability at the water surface to kill mosquito larvae hanging below the water surface for survival and the electrostatic interaction between alginate and gelatin of this carrier can effectively reduce the degradation rate of pyrethrin in water exhibiting a long drug release time.

 

Read our interview with the authors.

What is the motivation behind this work?

People living in humid environments, especially next to lakes and swamps and in rainforests, are often attacked by mosquitoes. So we wanted to prepare a green biodegradable drug slow-release carrier loaded with green anti-mosquito drug (pyrethrin) to kill mosquitoes without damaging the local environment.

What aspects of this work are you most excited about at the moment and what do you find most challenging about it?

We find it most challenging to use the green route to impart good hydrophobicity and superior material stability to the drug carriers, and we are very excited about the long drug release time and superior floatation and storage stability of the drug carriers we have prepared.

What is the next step? What work is planned?

Our next steps will be to explore some research around liquid marbles in other directions of green chemistry. We will use the characteristics of liquid marbles to do some work in the fields of drug loading, adsorption and separation, and catalysis.

Please describe your journey to becoming part of the Green Chemistry community?

We wanted to reduce the number of mosquitoes in our living environment through green chemistry without damaging the environment, so we did work in this area. Green Chemistry, a top journal in the field of chemistry focusing on green chemistry and sustainability, was a perfect fit for our work, so we published our work in Green Chemistry.

What do you think the Green Chemistry journal has done well in the past 25 years, and what do you think are the main challenges our community will face in the next 25 years?

We consider that what the Green Chemistry journal has done best over the past 25 years is to provide a unique forum for the publication of innovative research in green chemistry as well as sustainable development. green chemistry is at the forefront of an evolving interdisciplinary field, so it is important to keep an eye out for innovative advances in green chemistry across disciplines.

Meet the authors   

Qihui Zhang is a Professor of Pharmaceutical Chemistry at Chongqing University, who received his PhD degree from Shenyang Pharmaceutical University. As a senior visiting scholar, he finished his advanced study at the University of Chicago under the tutelage of Chair Professor Chun-Su Yuan. Professor Zhang is also the invited reviewer for more than ten top international journals. The main research interests of Professor Zhang include extraction, separation and structural modification of natural products based on molecular imprinting technology and nanotechnology.
Liandi Zhou, born in 1978, Ph.D., graduated from China Medical University in 2008, Associate Professor, Director of Pathogenic Biology and Immunology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chongqing College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Director of Chongqing Microbiology Society, and former expert of Chongqing Municipal Science and Technology Commission for reviewing medical projects. He has participated in one national-level project, two school-level projects of Chongqing Medical University, two planning textbooks of Science Press, and one school-level teaching reform project of Chongqing Medical University, and has published five papers on teaching reform. Her main research interests include the regulation of immune-related diseases by active ingredients of traditional Chinese medicine and their mechanisms, and she has published more than 20 SCI papers as a corresponding author.
Dr. Saimeng Jin obtained his PhD degree in chemistry from the University of York (United Kingdom, with Prof. James Clark) in 2017 and his BSc degree from the Sichuan University (China, with Prof. Bi Shi) in 2010. He currently works as a Associate Professor at the School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University. He hosts the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22208036). His research interests include dimethyl carbonate chemistry, conversion of biomass.
James Clark is Professor of Chemistry at the University of York, and is Founding Director of the Green Chemistry Centre of Excellence and the Bio-renewables Development Centre. He is also Chair Professor at Fudan University in China and holds honorary doctorates at the Universities of Ghent, Leuphana and Umea. He is a Visiting Professor at Sichuan University and was the International Visitor at the University of cape Town. He has won prizes and awards from many organisations including the 2018 Royal Society of Chemistry Green Chemistry Prize and the 2021 European Sustainable Chemistry award. His research involves the application of green chemical technologies to waste or low value feedstocks notably biomass so as to create new green and sustainable supply chains for chemical and material products. Some of his discoveries in research include a new bio-based solvent Cyrene® to replace toxic amides (produced by Circa Group Ltd including in a new €50M manufacturing plant in France), unique bio-based carbonaceous materials (commercialised through his award-winning spin-out company Starbons® Ltd with applications in areas including medical devices) and new routes to waste plastics recycling (through his new spin-out company Addible.Ltd). James has also been very actively involved in green chemistry publishing, education and networking: he was founding editor of the world-leading Green Chemistry journal, heads the advisory board for the RSC Green Chemistry book series and he was founding director of the worlds’ longest running green chemistry MSc program as well as the Green Chemistry network and the Global Green Chemistry Centres network. (“G2C2”).

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Green Chemistry 25th Anniversary Collection: Solvent effects on carbohydrate transformation: insights into chemical pathway modulation

Over the past 25 years, Green Chemistry has provided a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative sustainable technologies, efficient utilisation of resources and the concomitant minimisation of waste. We are delighted to bring together a very special issue containing articles by members of the green chemistry community as well as past and present Green Chemistry Board members, to mark and celebrate our first 25 years.

Among the contributions to this themed collection is a Critical Review that summarizes the primary types of carbohydrate chemical transformation and commonly used solvent systems, providing an overview of solvent effects in these reactions and an insight into solvent effects from a microscopic perspective (DOI: 10.1039/D3GC04901A)

The review also provides relevant insights into the current status and challenges of solvent engineering, contributing to the solvent construction of carbohydrate reaction systems.

Read our interview with Haipeng Yu, the corresponding author here:

How would you set this article in a wider context?

The development of biomass resources is progressively moving towards refinement for higher-value benefits. Carbohydrates are an important component of biomass resources, and the chemicals obtained from their chemical derivatization are key intermediates in the production of biofuels, bioplastics, pharmaceuticals and fine chemicals, which makes carbohydrate resources a favourable alternative to traditional fossil energy sources. This article provides relevant insights into how solvent effects modulate carbohydrate reactions and also offers key information to optimize the reactions and improve their sustainability and environmental friendliness. The modulation of chemical pathways by solvents is a pervasive application. This article not only advances the understanding of biomass-derived chemical production, but also contributes to broader fields such as organic synthesis, materials science, industrial process design and green chemistry. It is hoped that this article will resonate across disciplines and provide a reference for more sustainable, efficient and targeted chemical processes.

What is the motivation behind this work?

We hope that this work will inspire future rationalized solvent design for specific chemical reactions. By understanding the mechanisms by which solvents regulate carbohydrate conversion pathways, researchers can develop novel and practical solvent systems that will improve the reaction efficiency and sustainability of a range of chemical processes.

What aspects of this work are you most excited about at the moment and what do you find most challenging about it?

The most interesting and challenging part of this work is the exploration and demonstration of the interaction between the solvent and other substances in the reaction system. The influence of solvent regulation on experimental results can be jointly supported through experimental control and microscopic simulation.

What is the next step? What work is planned?

In the next step, we plan to utilize solvent effects to develop related fine chemicals based on the sugar platform.

Please describe your journey to becoming part of the Green Chemistry community.

My journey began in my graduate studies when I recognized the environmental impact of traditional chemical processes, and I was inspired by sustainable chemistry to delve deeper into biomass conversion. I have been working on projects with my teachers and fellow students on green catalysts, synthetic routes, and bio-based materials. In the process I have come to understand the Green Chemistry community and become a part of it. In the future, I will take green chemistry as my purpose and continue to focus on the development of sustainable biomass conversion and utilization.

Why did you choose to publish in Green Chemistry?

I chose to publish in Green Chemistry because it aligns with the commitment to advancing sustainable and environmentally friendly chemical processes. The journal is a leading platform for cutting-edge research that promotes the principles of green chemistry. By publishing in Green Chemistry, I have the opportunity to contribute to a global community of scientists who are focused on developing innovative, sustainable solutions that address environmental challenges.

What do you think the Green Chemistry journal has done well in the past 25 years, and what do you think are the main challenges our community will face in the next 25 years?

Over the past 25 years, Green Chemistry has played a pivotal role in advancing sustainable science by providing a respected platform for researchers to share groundbreaking work on environmentally friendly chemical processes. The journal has successfully promoted the 12 Principles of Green Chemistry, helping shift industry and academic focus toward designing safer chemicals, using renewable resources, and minimizing waste. It has also facilitated collaboration between chemists, engineers, and policy-makers, driving practical applications of green technologies in industries like pharmaceuticals, energy, and materials science.

However, as we look ahead to the next 25 years, scaling sustainable technologies for widespread industrial adoption remains a major hurdle, as many green alternatives still struggle to compete economically with conventional processes. The journal may need to focus more on scaling up the practicality and economics of green chemistry processes. Additionally, as global environmental policies and regulations evolve, the journal may need to adjust its focus and content to remain relevant and impactful, including a greater emphasis on topics such as chemical recycling, renewable resource, and carbon footprint reduction.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Green Chemistry 25th Anniversary Collection: Deep eutectic solvents as green solvents for materials preparation

Over the past 25 years, Green Chemistry has provided a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative sustainable technologies, efficient utilisation of resources and the concomitant minimisation of waste. We are delighted to bring together a very special issue containing articles by members of the green chemistry community as well as past and present Green Chemistry Board members, to mark and celebrate our first 25 years.

Among the contributions to this themed collection is a Critical Review on the application of Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) in the materials preparation process, starting from their unique and significant properties, combined with specific examples to propose how to design solvent systems according to various demands and purposes (DOI: 10.1039/D4GC00136B). The combination of green chemistry principles with innovative material design is expected to reshape industry technologies in a sustainable, efficient, and cutting-edge manner.

Read our interview with the corresponding authors

How would you set this article in a wider context?

This article not only provides a comprehensive summary of fundamental research but is also supported by practical case studies, offering convenience for chemists and material scientists in their research. Additionally, the economic feasibility and environmental impact have been evaluated, which may serve as a reference for policymakers.

What is the motivation behind this work?

The study of the properties of DESs has become quite mature, and therefore, their effective use has become a focal point. The heterogeneity of DESs is a characteristic of these solvents, but what is its relationship with morphology control? Why can DESs function not only as solvents but also as templates and reducing agents? These deeper questions have been explored, but systematic discussions and comparisons are lacking. We have bridged two aspects of this field: starting from the excellent solubility of DESs to the preparation of various functional materials.

What aspects of this work are you most excited about at the moment and what do you find most challenging about it?

Pairwise summarization of work presents challenges, for example, inserting-leaching, etching-coating, doping-compositing, bottom-up and top-down approaches. Additionally, summarizing the electrodeposition of pure metals and common alloys is also a complex task.

What is the next step? What work is planned?

Moving forward, our work will continue to focus on green chemistry research in the following areas:
a. Forestry Resource Chemistry: pretreatment and high-value conversion of biomass and platform compounds
b. Resource and Environmental Chemistry: separation and purification of greenhouse gases, VOCs, waste plastics, minerals, and electronic waste

Why did you choose to publish in Green Chemistry?

All along, Green Chemistry is one of the most influential journals in this field. Green synthesis, green manufacturing and green energy are all inseparable from the basic concept of green chemistry. We believe that this work will demonstrate its greatest impact here.

What do you think the Green Chemistry journal has done well in the past 25 years, and what do you think are the main challenges our community will face in the next 25 years?

From the proposal of the 12 principles of green chemistry to the establishment of the journal Green Chemistry, scientists have gradually built a solid foundation for their research efforts. We believe that over the past 25 years, Green Chemistry as a publication has consistently promoted the concept of a sustainable society and the continuous development of humanity. In the next 25 years, the key will be how to attract high-quality research for publication, especially given the intense competition already evident within the publishing industry. More importantly, it is crucial to gain insights into the chemical elements involved in green development, thereby guiding progress in related fields.

Meet the corresponding authors

Prof. Tiancheng Mu received his Ph.D. in physical chemistry from the Institute of Chemistry, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, in 2004. He worked in the Department of Industrial Chemistry, Oldenburg University, as a postdoc from 2005 to 2007. He is currently a full professor in the Department of Chemistry, Renmin University of China. He has authored over 200 peer-reviewed scientific publications and six book chapters. He currently serves as an Associate Editor for RSC Advances, and as an Advisory Board Member for CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water. He is vice-director of the Ionic Liquids Committee of the Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China.
Prof. Zhimin Xue received her Ph.D. degree from Renmin University of China in 2014. From 2018 to 2019, she was a visiting associate professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She is currently a professor at Beijing Forestry University. Her research interests cover the treatment and conversion of biomass, design, and applications of green solvents. Furthermore, she was awarded the Prize of Liangxi Forestry Science and Technology Award and the Science and Technology Award of the China Association for Instrumental Analysis. She was selected for the National High-level Talent Special Support Plan in 2021.

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Green Chemistry 25th Anniversary Collection: The need to integrate mass- and energy-based metrics with life cycle impacts for sustainable chemicals manufacture

Over the past 25 years, Green Chemistry has provided a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative sustainable technologies, efficient utilisation of resources and the concomitant minimisation of waste. We are delighted to bring together a very special issue containing articles by members of the green chemistry community as well as past and present Green Chemistry Board members, to mark and celebrate our first 25 years.

Among the contributions to this themed collection is a Paper on quantifying  the level of correlation and linkages between five mass- and energy-based metrics and 16 LCA indicator scores by leveraging data for over 700 chemical manufacturing processes (DOI: 10.1039/D4GC00394B)

Synthetic chemicals are essential to everyday life, supporting everything from food security and health care to electronics and clothing. Scientists and engineers are constantly searching for greener production routes, but designing them requires methods to quantify their environmental impact. This article evaluates different metrics of varying complexity, identifying their pros and cons.

Read our interview with Javier Pérez-Ramírez and Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez

How would you set this article in a wider context?

Global chemical demand is projected to grow by 40% this decade, while the chemical industry faces mounting pressure to reduce its substantial environmental footprint. We highlight the critical role of metrics in assessing environmental impacts and emphasise the importance of a holistic approach to guide prioritisation and more informed decision-making.

What is the motivation behind this work?

Overall, our goal is to promote the broad adoption of quantitative metrics in research. The global aspiration of the community to make the world a better place through chemistry often relies on narrow or simplified indicators, leading to unclear environmental benefits. We addressed this by using more comprehensive and standardised approaches across a wide range of key chemical processes to understand the differences in the information they provide.

What aspects of this work are you most excited about at the moment and what do you find most challenging about it?

We’re particularly excited about how comprehensive sustainability metrics like life cycle assessments (LCA) can rank chemical processes based on diverse environmental impacts, going beyond the CO2 footprint. Our results indicate that different methods present distinct advantages and trade-offs across various environmental criteria. Current challenges include the limited availability and uncertainty of openly accessible data, as well as the need to bring the experimental and systems engineering communities closer in the coming years.

What is the next step? What work is planned?

We conclude from our results that increasing the use of comprehensive LCA in early research stages is key. To address this, we aim to make these environmental analyses more accessible through user-friendly tools. Additionally, we will focus on data standardisation and robust methods for managing data uncertainty, as well as proposing effective schemes for ranking chemicals based on distinct impacts, which remains challenging.

Please describe your journey to becoming part of the Green Chemistry community

We view our journey into the Green Chemistry community as a natural progression of our commitment to making a positive societal impact. Chemistry will play a pivotal role in implementing the sustainable development goals and combating climate change, and we believe that embracing the guiding principles of Green Chemistry is essential for this mission within an interdisciplinary approach.

Why did you choose to publish in Green Chemistry?

We chose Green Chemistry for its unique focus on alternative green technologies and sustained leadership in the field. The themed collection ‘Measuring Green Chemistry: Methods, Models, and Metrics‘ aligns with our focus on quantifying environmental impacts, making it the ideal platform for our study.

What do you think the Green Chemistry journal has done well in the past 25 years, and what do you think are the main challenges our community will face in the next 25 years?

Green Chemistry has been instrumental in uniting a diverse community under a shared philosophy grounded in the Green Chemistry principles and has successfully adapted to the evolving landscape of sustainable chemistry. As mentioned above, one of the major challenges will be achieving the application of standardised metrics in both academic and industrial arenas, for which different stakeholders must collaborate.

 

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Green Chemistry 25th Anniversary Collection: A robust heterogeneous chiral phosphoric acid enables multi decagram scale production of optically active N,S-ketals

Over the past 25 years, Green Chemistry has provided a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative sustainable technologies, efficient utilisation of resources and the concomitant minimisation of waste. We are delighted to bring together as very special issue containing articles by members of the green chemistry community as well as past and present Green Chemistry Board members, to mark and celebrate our first 25 years.

Among the contributions to this themed collection is a Paper on the application of a highly recyclable heterogeneous catalyst to the multi-decagram synthesis of enantiomerically enriched molecules in continuous-flow using a 2 mL reactor. The combination of this catalyst with a new reactor design increased the productivity from milligrams to up to 20 g scale in a few hours while reducing the overall environmental impact of the reaction (DOI: 10.1039/D4GC00019F)

Organocatalysis has become one of the pillars of asymmetric catalysis along with metal and enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Its potential was recognized in 2019 by the IUPAC, as a part of the top 10 emerging technologies in chemistry, and by the Nobel Prize awarded to Benjamin List and David MacMillan in 2021.However, these reactions are often too inefficient due to the high catalyst cost and scalability issues, leading to limited applicability in the industry. In this context, developing heterogeneous catalysts can simplify the recycling process, making catalytic processes more efficient and contributing to minimizing the overall cost and environmental impact of the reaction.

Read our interview with Aitor Maestro and C. Oliver Kappe

What is the motivation behind this work?

Although the use of heterogeneous catalysts and continuous flow technology in asymmetric catalysis is not new, the productivity of known processes is often rather limited. Developing new and reliable enantioselective processes for reproducing batch reactions on a large scale requires a combination of chemical and technical solutions. In this article, we wanted to illustrate the potential of combining these techniques to achieve higher productivity and set up a precedent for future developments in the field.

What aspects of this work are you most excited about at the moment and what do you find most challenging about it?

One of the most exciting results of this project was the high robustness of the heterogeneous catalyst. While similar homogeneous reactions often require 2-10 mol% of the catalyst, we managed to decrease it up to 0.1%. Moreover, the analysis of the catalyst after the reaction did not show any visible physical or chemical degradation, indicating it could be used for much longer.

One of the biggest challenges is the development of new heterogeneous catalysts that efficiently mimic the behaviour of their homogeneous counterparts. While solid supports facilitate the recycling process, they can also affect the reactivity.

What is the next step? What work is planned?

We are willing to further explore the potential of highly active heterogeneous chiral catalysts for other applications in the future. We want to apply them to the synthesis of key chiral building blocks and active pharmaceutical ingredients.

Please describe your journey to becoming part of the Green Chemistry community

Integrating technical solutions with intricate catalytic reactions helps reduce the overall waste, create more sustainable chemical processes, and enhance reaction efficiency. Therefore, focusing on the intersection of catalysis and technology aligns perfectly with the principles of green chemistry.

Why did you choose to publish in Green Chemistry?

This is one of the leading journals in the field of green chemistry research. We thought our work involving catalyst recyclability studies and waste reduction of the reported enantioselective reaction was a good fit for the scope of the journal.

What do you think the Green Chemistry journal has done well in the past 25 years, and what do you think are the main challenges our community will face in the next 25 years?

One of the biggest challenges for the journal is being focused on a constantly changing field. Many aspects of green chemistry are often directed by global trends or new legal regulations. Some current challenges that will probably get more attention in the coming years are obtaining raw chemicals from renewable sources such as CO2 or the development of economically viable catalytic processes.

Meet the corresponding authors

Aitor Maestro obtained his PhD (2019) from the University of the Basque Country, working on asymmetric organocatalysis. After two postdoctoral stays (University of Groningen, and University of St. Andrews), in 2022, he obtained a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Basque Government, allowing him to spend two years at the University of Graz working on asymmetric catalysis in continuous flow before moving back to the University of the Basque Country, where he is currently working on independent projects related to the development and applications of recyclable chiral catalysts.
Oliver Kappe received his diploma (1989) and his doctoral (1992) degrees in organic chemistry from the University of Graz and after two postdoctoral stays (University of Queensland and Emory University) returned to Graz in 1996 to start his indepenent acacdemic career and was appointed Full Professor in 2011. For the past decade the focus of his research has been directed towards flow chemistry/microreaction technology, encompassing a wide variety of synthetic transformations and experimental techniques.

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Green Chemistry 25th Anniversary Collection: A comparative study of palladium-gold and palladium-tin catalysts in the direct synthesis of H2O2

Over the past 25 years, Green Chemistry has provided a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative sustainable technologies, efficient utilisation of resources and the concomitant minimisation of waste. We are delighted to bring together a very special issue containing articles by members of the green chemistry community as well as past and present Green Chemistry Board members, to mark and celebrate our first 25 years.

Among the contributions to this themed collection is a Paper on the promotive effect of Au and Sn incorporation into supported Pd nanoparticles for the direct synthesis of H2O2 from molecular H2 and O2  (DOI: 10.1039/D3GC03706A).

The direct synthesis of H2O2 from the elements represents an atom-efficient alternative to the current indirect industrial process, allowing for localised production of a major commodity chemical used in sectors as varied as chemical synthesis, bleaching and disinfection. However, despite over 100 years of research, few examples of highly selective catalysts (i.e. those that do not degrade H2O2 to H2O), exist. Catalysts based on PdAu and PdSn active sites are an exception to this generality and this work compares and contrasts the efficacy of these two systems towards H2O2 production and demonstrates the excellent performance metrics which can be offered by these two distinct classes of materials.

Read our interview with Dr Richard J. Lewis, one of the authors, here.

How would you set this article in a wider context?

AuPd catalysts have been well studied in recent decades for a range of chemical transformations, including H2O2 synthesis. However, the replacement of Au with Sn, and the resulting improvement in catalytic efficiency that results, is a relatively new discovery, with earlier works in this area focussed on (i) the use of complex catalyst synthesis protocols to form Sn overlayers that encapsulate highly active yet unselective Pd species or (ii) the study of idealised, model PdSn catalysts in order to gain a fundamental understanding of the structure-reactivity relationships that exist in such systems.

Importantly the materials studied within this work are produced via a readily scalable synthesis protocol and compete with state-of-the-art materials reported within the academic literature, including those previously reported by our laboratory. Crucially they can achieve the high selectivity necessary for the direct route to H2O2 synthesis to compete with the current industrial approach to production.


What is the motivation behind this work?

Despite calls for uniformity in testing regimes, it is typical for stark differences in catalyst evaluation protocols and reaction conditions to exist between research groups. This is somewhat understandable given that researchers wish to evaluate catalytic performance under conditions idealised for their particular system, as well as allowing  for benchmarking against earlier works from their own laboratory. However, this often leads to confusion as to the current state-of-the-art, with comparison of catalysts, especially those from different laboratories, under standardised conditions rarely performed. In this work, we set out to address this concern, comparing and contrasting the performance of a series of catalysts based on the well-established AuPd formulation, against the emerging class materials centred around PdSn.

What aspects of this work are you most excited about at the moment and what do you find most challenging about it?

The performance of our 0.25%Pd–2.25%Sn/TiO2 catalyst is particularly exciting, offering near-total selectivity towards H2O2 and product yields superior to the optimised AuPd formulation. Indeed, the performance of this catalyst can be considered among the state-of-the-art.  The mechanism by which this improved reactivity is achieved is also intriguing, with the addition of high quantities of Sn promoting Pd dispersion and the formation of highly active and selective, single atoms of Pd surrounded by Sn/SnOx domains, rather than through the formation of PdSn alloys as may have been expected based on earlier works.

What is the next step? What work is planned?

While these systems are highly promising it is important to note that they represent only the first generation of materials developed in this project. As such our focus has now shifted towards the redesign and further optimisation of these catalyst formulations to ensure the key performance metrics (high reactivity and near-total selectivity towards H2O2) are maintained over industrially relevant lifetimes. We are also actively pursuing the translation of these research-grade catalysts into technical-grade materials to allow for further evaluation under realistic operating conditions, as well as use in alternative chemical transformations centred around the utilisation of in-situ synthesised H2O2.  We are also seeking a greater understanding of the dynamic nature of these systems during catalysis, through the use of operando and in-situ characterisation techniques. This is particularly exciting and allows us the opportunity to collaborate with colleagues from fields adjacent to catalysis, including spectroscopists and microscopists.

Please describe your journey to becoming part of the Green Chemistry community

Engineering a more sustainable world aligns perfectly with the aims of the Green Chemistry and Catalysis communities, as such it is easy to consider the members of these two fields as part of the same family, rather than belonging to two distinct communities whose goals are sometimes shared.  Therefore there has not been a journey towards a Green Chemistry community, rather there is a shared journey with friends and colleagues of one community.

Why did you choose to publish in Green Chemistry?

Green Chemistry is, without doubt, one of the flagship journals in the field of sustainability, built on the foundations laid out by Paul Anastas and Nicolas Eghbali and nurtured by past and present members of the journal Editorial Board. One of the major themes of  Green Chemistry is to find solutions to many of the grand challenges facing the chemical industries through the design, synthesis and evaluation of novel materials and alternative processes. We consider that our manuscript aligned very well with these ambitions and given the broad readership of the journal, we could think of no better home than Green Chemistry.

What do you think the Green Chemistry journal has done well in the past 25 years, and what do you think are the main challenges our community will face in the next 25 years?

For the past 25 years, Green Chemistry has been at the forefront of advances in sustainability and environmental protection, continually promoting the development of new technologies that improve efficiency and minimise the impact of the chemical sector, both to humans and the wider ecosystem. A major challenge facing the chemical sector has and will continue to be the transition towards manufacturing processes that better utilise raw materials and minimise the production of waste by-products. This challenge will only grow with the transition toward alternative, non-fossil-derived feedstocks supplied from a wide variety of sources.  The drive towards Net Zero poses both challenges and opportunities for the field, with the emergence of new feedstocks including sequestered CO2, NH3,  biomass and carbon-free H2 requiring the development of new processes and modifications to existing technology. The associated shift towards electrification will also result in changes in supply/demand dynamics of critical elements that will undoubtedly result in increased utilisation of many earth-abundant metals (e.g. for use in energy storage), while the shift away from fossil fuel-based transit will have unpredictable effects on the supply of many of the precious metals that are utilised in petroleum refining and automotive exhaust treatment and have been the backbone of the chemical synthesis sector.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Green and Sustainable Chemistry Symposium – a celebration of 25 years of the journal Green Chemistry

On June 24th 2024, the Green and Sustainable Chemistry Symposium – a celebration of 25 years of the journal Green Chemistry, co-sponsored by the Royal Society of Chemistry, Asynt and the University of York Department of Chemistry, was held.  This conference not only marked the 25th anniversary of the journal Green Chemistry but was a fantastic first major event for York’s Green and Sustainable Chemistry Research Theme.
It covered a deliberately broad programme, with contributions from both academia and industry, and topics ranging from valorisation of biomass, and teaching of green chemistry, to electrochemistry, reactor design and Bismuth chemistry – maybe not something people might first expect at this sort of symposium, but when compared with previous mercury chemistry the sustainability advantages were clear.
Prof Helen Sneddon hosted the event, and there were 11 excellent talks, challenging the audience to think about Green chemistry beyond usual preconceptions.  There was active discussion between speakers and attendees – who included both University of York researchers taking advantage of the event on home turf, and academic and industry researchers who had travelled from around the UK.

The poster session, which contained posters from Postdoctoral Research Assistants, PhD students, and 1 Masters student (indeed one of the 2 poster prize winners) prompted further discussion. Also notable was one poster with a detailed analysis of a Chemistry Department’s road to net zero prompting discussions about the sustainability of laboratory research – a topic of much recent interest.

The supplier, and co-sponsor Asynt showcased a range of laboratory equipment, including an electrochemical reactor designed by, and featuring in, one of the talks by Charlotte Willans.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

International Symposium on Green Chemistry – ISGC 2025

Green Chemistry is delighted to support the International Symposium on Green Chemistry – ISGC 2025 which will be held in La Rochelle, France from May 12-16, 2025. There will be plenary conference and keynotes, 320 oral communications, start up pitch sessions and poster sessions.

About this conference

The conference aims to gather the most eminent scientists involved in the field of green chemistry to debate on the future challenges of chemistry, keeping in mind the problems of access to a sustainable energy, the management of resources (carbon, water, metals, minerals), human development, global warming, impact on the environment and competitiveness of industry.

Among the speakers are Green Chemistry’s Editorial Board Member Serenella Salla (European Commission – Joint Research Centre, Italy), and Green Chemistry’s Advisory Board Member Douglas MacFarlane (Monash University, Australia). A complete list of the Plenary lectures and Keynotes can be found here

Call for abstracts

  • The call for abstracts (oral communication) will be open from September 30, 2024 to December 15, 2024.
  • The poster submission deadline is April 15, 2025

Create your account and submit your abstract online here.

Themed collection

As art of our partnership, Green Chemistry and RSC Sustainability will be publishing a selection of papers based on presentations at this event in a Themed Collection Guest Edited by François Jérôme (University of Poitiers, France).

The collection comprising articles based on presentations from the International Symposium on Green Chemistry 2022 meeting held in La Rochelle, France between 16th-20th May 2022 can be found here

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Green Chemistry 25th Anniversary Collection: The need for hotspot-driven research

Over the past 25 years, Green Chemistry has provided a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative sustainable technologies, efficient utilisation of resources and the concomitant minimisation of waste. We are delighted to bring together as very special issue containing articles by members of the green chemistry community as well as past and present Green Chemistry Board members, to mark and celebrate our first 25 years.

Among the contributions to this themed collection is a perspective article on the need for hotspot-driven research (DOI: 10.1039/D3GC03601D) co-authored by Philip Jessop (Green Chemistry’s former Chair) and Alex R. MacDonald. The authors define a hotspot as a chemical, process step, or life stage that causes more harm than the others (whether considering global warming, ecotoxicity, or resource consumption). For example, during the life cycle of beer, more global warming is caused by the manufacturing of the glass bottle than the agriculture, beer production, transport, and waste management steps combined.  Thus, making the bottle is the global warming hotspot.

In this perspective the authors explain the need for greater utilization of life cycle assessments (LCA) of existing processes to identify the hotspots and for that identification to be the driver for the selection of new research projects and directions.

Greening a step in a process, without checking whether it is a hotspot, may still lead to environmental harm reduction but the benefit of green chemistry research will be greater if we direct our efforts towards hotspots”.

However, the most challenging aspect of this strategy for green chemistry is identifying the most harmful step in a process, the hotspot. LCA is the best way to identify the hotspot, but few chemists are trained to do LCA and it’s far from trivial to learn. The most exciting aspect is the growing availability of LCA data. As LCA studies become more common, it will become easier for green chemists to identify hotspots and choose to fix them. Hotspot-driven research will maximize the environmental benefit of green chemistry research

Read our interview with Philip Jessop Below.

Could you briefly explain the focus of your article to the non-specialist?

Green chemistry researchers want to use their time and skills to make products greener, but don’t have the time to solve everything. Researchers must therefore focus their work on the most harmful parts of a process or product. That means researchers must first identify which parts are the most harmful before deciding what to work on.

How would you set this article in a wider context?

Everybody wants to have greener products. Society expects scientists and engineers to improve the way products are made in order to reduce environmental harm. However, research itself takes time and money, and contributes to harm. Therefore, researchers must be careful to choose projects that have the maximum likely benefit.

 

 

What is the motivation behind this work?

Frustration. The effort being put into green chemistry by the global research community is wonderful to see, but a lot of research, including some of my own, has been aimed at solving very minor problems. For example, if the manufacture of a product takes 12 steps from mining to retail, and 99% of the environmental harm comes from step #4, then any effort to make step #6 greener is unlikely to lead to environmental benefit. Just as bad is any attempt to make a step greener without checking to see if it’s the most harmful step.

What is the next step? What work is planned? 

The idea of hotspot-directed research will, at least at my university and hopefully at others, become part of green chemistry education. Also, I’m writing a book to help the public understand how they, as consumers, can choose the greenest options in their shopping and how they can identify the hotspots in their own lifestyles.

Please describe your journey to becoming part of the Green Chemistry community 

I’ve been publishing green chemistry research since 1994 but my first paper published in the journal Green Chemistry was in 2003. That was the first of 40. I joined the editorial board in 2014 and chaired the editorial board 2017-2022.

Why did you choose to publish in Green Chemistry?

Even today, with the millions of competing journals, Green Chemistry is the flagship journal for the field. When I have a paper that I believe would be valuable for the green chemistry community, this journal is my first choice of venue to reach that audience.

What do you think the Green Chemistry journal has done well in the past 25 years, and what do you think are the main challenges our community will face in the next 25 years? 

The field of green chemistry is growing up, but during its childhood it was constantly changing. The journal has changed as well in order to best serve the community’s changing needs. At the beginning, discussion was needed so that the community could come together, and the journal delivered that. As the field matured, informal discussion was dropped in favour of refereed perspectives papers. In the past few years, the emphasis has shifted again, to favouring, and in fact requiring, papers with better discussion of the environmental advantages and disadvantages of new chemistries. In the future, the journal will have to continue to change with the times because of new trends that are shaping the field and therefore shaping how research is done and reported. New trends include computer-aided design, AI, LCA use at all stages of research, social LCA, and hotspot-driven research.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Measuring Green Chemistry: Methods, Models, and Metrics

 

Green Chemistry, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, Energy & Environmental ScienceChem Soc Rev and Analytical Methods are delighted to present their most recent post publication Themed Collection ➡Measuring Green Chemistry: Methods, Models, and Metrics

This cross-journal-themed collection showcases selected examples aiming to quantify the benefits and trade-offs of green chemistry by providing assessment methods, models, indicators, and metrics. The collection is intended as a guide and accessible resource for the whole chemical community while helping authors to measure, compare, and describe the advantages and disadvantages of introducing green chemistry principles and approaches in their work.

All papers included were personally selected by Green Chemistry’s Board Members André Bardow (ETH Zürich) and Serenella Sala (European Commission – Joint Research Centre), Green Chemistry’s Associate Editor Luigi Vaccaro (Università degli Studi di Perugia) and Green Chemistry’s Chair Javier Pérez-Ramírez (ETH Zürich)

The collection includes, but is not limited to, examples of application of green chemistry principles as well as methods for measuring their efficacy in improving chemicals or in selecting a preferred alternative, such as E factor, green analytical procedure Index (GAPI) processes, process mass intensity, eco-scale, techno-economic analysis, life-cycle assessment, carbon balance analysis. The collection entails example of application of individual metrics and indicators as well as multicriteria assessment and addresses as well green chemistry education.

Read the full collection: https://rsc.li/measuringgchem

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)