Author Archive

Cleaning up water

Dion Dionysiou is professor of environmental engineering and science at the University of Cincinnati, US, where he works on advanced oxidation technologies for water treatment.

What inspired you to go into science?
After my national service in the army I studied chemical engineering at the National Technical University in Athens, Greece. I enjoyed both the engineering and chemistry courses. I also worked hard to improve my English at this time because I really wanted to go to the US for graduate studies.

I gained a place at Tufts University, Massachusetts, and my masters thesis focused on developing de-icing materials for roads, particularly crystallisation of environmentally friendly de-icing solutions, for example, calcium magnesium acetate. I then worked for W. R. Grace & Co. to develop masonry materials and later went on to the University of Cincinnati, Ohio, where initially my PhD dealt with developing perovskite materials for gas separations and advanced materials for energy applications.

What made you switch to studying water?

I always wanted to work with water related issues, ever since being a child in Cyprus where there was a major issue of water scarcity. When I was quite young, people in my small town in Cyprus had to get water each day from fountains in their neighbourhoods because we didn’t have a direct supply to the house. This experience has made me especially interested in water conservation and water supply.

Why did you focus on advanced oxidation technologies in water treatment?
During my PhD I moved into the field of environmental engineering and studied photocatalysis for water purification, which was funded by the Center of International Research for Water and the Environment (Centre International de Recherche Sur l’Eau et l’Environnement) of ONDEO Services. Around this time, in 1996, there was an international conference on advanced oxidation technologies, which took place in Cincinnati. Photocatalysis was one of the processes covered, along with various other methods that interested me. I was a student helper that first year and every year after that I aimed to present some of my work at that particular meeting.

Within your field, what is the next big thing?
Advanced oxidation is an area of tremendous growth as a means of treating wastewater for reuse in irrigation or even for human consumption. Singapore is a very good example of where such technologies are being used. Here in southern California, membrane microfiltration is one approach. Reverse osmosis and combined UV-hydrogen peroxide treatments are also used.

Water availability in developing countries is another very important topic. Many communities don’t have access to clean water and large numbers of people die from water borne diseases. Water forms an integrated cycle: wastewater when discharged into rivers or lakes ultimately becomes a source of drinking water. So clearly the content of pharmaceutical and other compounds in water must be regulated. Eutrophication of water resources, which leads in many cases to the formation of harmful algal blooms and associated cyanotoxins, should also be eliminated or at least minimised.

Another developing area concerns the analytical methods needed to detect compounds of emerging concern. New compounds are being introduced into the water system and their biological and chemical breakdown products need to be identified and their toxicity understood.

There are also new materials being developed for use in water treatment. Nanomaterials can be involved in removal of pollutants from water, but may in turn enter the water themselves. There is a need to predict and monitor what happens to these materials. Photocatalytic materials, for example, have nano components that can leach out and the effects of pH and other factors on these in the complex matrix of water need to be understood in order to see the whole picture.

What advice would you give to a young person who is considering a career in science?

I think there are tremendous opportunities with respect to a career in science and engineering and I would encourage young people to explore these opportunities. Discovery is a beautiful thing. I would also encourage them to be creative and motivated. I believe young people are smarter than we are, and we should do all we can as educators of the next generation to help provide opportunities for these young people.

What would you do differently if you had the chance?

I would focus more on chemistry. I am a chemical engineer and work on materials for environmental applications, but if I had the chance again I would go deeper into the fundamentals, into basic science, simply because I like it. I enjoy understanding something in depth. For example, in environmental engineering you are often dealing with a very complex system: water and water treatment involve complex interactions – microbes, natural organic matter, chemical oxidants and inorganic chemicals. I enjoy discovering the mechanistic aspects of these interactions.

What I enjoy about engineering is that you can solve problems for humanity. To purify and recycle water is a very valuable thing to do. In Cyprus we have desalination plants but they are expensive and so working to develop better membranes to deliver water recycling at reduced cost is good to do. When scientists and engineers work together, that’s great.

When you’re not doing science and engineering, what do you like doing?
I enjoy my involvement with publishers and I take my editorial and refereeing responsibilities very seriously. I also love watching soccer, particularly European soccer – I’m a big fan. I don’t play soccer anymore, but I have two daughters who both play here in the US.

For the original interview article see Chemistry World

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

HOT: pathogens in the water – methods for measuring Salmonella and other bacteria

The quality of our water is always a key environmental issue, but measuring pathogens in water sources can be tricky.  Instead, bacteria such as E. coli – which in themselves do not cause illness but are present alongside pathogens in contaminated water –  have historically been used as indicators of water quality.  This method has been criticised, and new technologies now enable quicker and easier detection of actual pathogens such as Salmonella.

In this hot paper, Alexandria Boehm‘s group at Stanford University have conducted the first study on the fate of non-seeded Salmonella and faecal bacterial indicators E. coli and enterococci in urban surface waters, specifically a creek in California with levels of E. coli that often exceed EPA limits. Surprisingly, the EPA has not yet set any Salmonella standards for drinking and recreational waters so these studies will be valuable in beginning to determine acceptable levels, as methodologies they have developed for monitoring the source and fate of the bacteria can be transferred to other water bodies.

To read more about their findings download the paper – it’s free to access for 4 weeks:

Sources and fate of Salmonella and fecal indicator bacteria in an urban creek
Lauren M. Sassoubre, Sarah P. Walters, Todd L. Russell and Alexandria B. Boehm
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, Advance Article
DOI: 10.1039/C1EM10213C

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Top 10 most accessed articles in May

This month sees the following articles in JEM that are in the top ten most accessed:-

The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment
Fadri Gottschalk and Bernd Nowack
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1145-1155
DOI: 10.1039/C0EM00547A

Origin, separation and identification of environmental nanoparticles: a review
Tsung M. Tsao, Yue M. Chen and Ming K. Wang
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1156-1163
DOI: 10.1039/C1EM10013K

Occurrence and removal of titanium at full scale wastewater treatment plants: implications for TiO2 nanomaterials

Paul Westerhoff, Guixue Song, Kiril Hristovski and Mehlika A. Kiser
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1195-1203
DOI: 10.1039/C1EM10017C

Pre-sampling contamination of filters used in measurements of airborne (1 → 3)-β-D-glucan based on glucan-specific Limulus amebocyte lysate assay
Elizabeth S. Shogren and Ju-Hyeong Park
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1082-1087
DOI: 10.1039/C0EM00495B

TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles negatively affect wheat growth and soil enzyme activities in agricultural soil

Wenchao Du, Yuanyuan Sun, Rong Ji, Jianguo Zhu, Jichun Wu and Hongyan Guo
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 822-828
DOI: 10.1039/C0EM00611D

Challenges for physical characterization of silver nanoparticles under pristine and environmentally relevant conditions

Robert I. MacCuspie, Kim Rogers, Manomita Patra, Zhiyong Suo, Andrew J. Allen, Matthew N. Martin and Vincent A. Hackley
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1212-1226
DOI: 10.1039/C1EM10024F

Okadaic acid induces morphological changes, apoptosis and cell cycle alterations in different human cell types
Vanessa Valdiglesias, Blanca Laffon, Eduardo Pásaro and Josefina Méndez
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1831-1840
DOI: 10.1039/C0EM00771D

The antibacterial effects of engineered nanomaterials: implications for wastewater treatment plants
Ndeke Musee, Melusi Thwala and Nomakhwezi Nota
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1164-1183
DOI: 10.1039/C1EM10023H

The devil is in the details (or the surface): impact of surface structure and surface energetics on understanding the behavior of nanomaterials in the environment
Imali A. Mudunkotuwa and Vicki H. Grassian
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1135-1144
DOI: 10.1039/C1EM00002K

Short-range transport of contaminants released from e-waste recycling site in South China
Huizhen Li, Jinmei Bai, Yetian Li, Hefa Cheng, Eddy Y. Zeng and Jing You
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 836-843
DOI: 10.1039/C0EM00633E

Why not take a look at the articles today and blog your thoughts and comments below.

Fancy submitting an article to JEM? Then why not submit to us today alternatively email us your suggestions.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

HOT: Protecting the environment – with the right information

One of the jobs of an environmental regulatory body is to establish acceptable levels of containments in the ecosystem under its jurisdiction.  But can the data they are basing their decisions on be relevant when standard toxicity tests have been carried out on non-native species, or when tests have not been carried out across the whole ecosystem?

This Critical Review from Samantha Eslava Martins and Adalto Bianchini at the Federal University of Rio Grande, Brazil, presents the first database of toxicological tests performed with Brazilian aquatic species.  Brazil has a hugely varied ecosystem and by analysing the database they were able to identify large gaps in current research efforts – both geographical and in the species tested.

Such an approach could be easily adopted by other countries, and could be a valuable tool to help researchers understand where more information is needed or to help policy makers make more realistic decisions about the protection of the environment.

As with all our HOT articles, this one is also free to access for 4 weeks, so why not take a look:

Toxicity tests aiming to protect Brazilian aquatic systems: current status and implications for management
Samantha Eslava Martins and Adalto Bianchini
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, Advance Article
DOI: 10.1039/C0EM00787K

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

HOT: REACHing better exposure models

Assessing exposure is an important aspect of complying with the EU REACH regulations.  In the pharmaceutical industry accurately determining occupational exposure to API can be difficult due to the nature of the pharmaceutical process.  There are modelling tools available to help give confident assessments of exposure, one of the most sophisticated of which is the Advanced REACH Tool (ART).

In this HOT paper Patricia McDonnell (National University of Ireland Galway) and colleagues from across Europe have optimised ART to model airborne exposure of workers in the pharmaceutical industry, by refining and validating the inhalable dust algorithm.

If you’re interested in evaluating exposure assessment models why not download the paper – it’s free to access for 4 weeks:

Validation of the inhalable dust algorithm of the Advanced REACH Tool using a dataset from the pharmaceutical industry
Patricia E. Mc Donnell, Jody M. Schinkel, Marie A. Coggins, Wouter Fransman, Hans Kromhout, John W. Cherrie and Erik L. Tielemans
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1597-1606
DOI: 10.1039/C1EM10189G

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

HOT: analysing a new insecticide exposure route for honey bees

Andrea Tapparo and colleagues at the University of Padua, Italy, have developed a fast method for analysing neonicotinoid insecticides using UHPLC-DAD.  The method was used to analyse the insecticide content of guttation drops on corn seedlings.  Guttation is the formation of xylem droplets on leaves – often confused with dew – and has recently been proposed as a mechanism for the exposure of detrimental doses of insecticide to honey bee populations.

This HOT article is featured on the front cover of Issue 6.  Why not download it today to read the results of this interesting study – it’s free to access for 6 weeks:

Rapid analysis of neonicotinoid insecticides in guttation drops of corn seedlings obtained from coated seeds
Andrea Tapparo, Chiara Giorio, Matteo Marzaro, Daniele Marton, Lidia Soldà and Vincenzo Girolami
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1564-1568
DOI: 10.1039/C1EM10085H, Paper

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

HOT: analysing effects of sampling techniques on the analyte

The last few decades has seen a huge increase in the amount of data we collect to monitor our environment.  But making sure we do so in a representative and comparable way is vital for extracting valuable information on what we are monitoring whether it be pollutants, contaminants or climate change.

In this HOT paper Thorsten Pohlert and colleagues from the Federal Institute of Hydrology have taken on the mammoth task of analysing the effect of sampling techniques for suspended matter in stream water in a 5 year dataset. They look at the effect that three different sampling devices – continuous-flow centrifuges, floating collectors and sedimentation tanks – have on the on subsequent particle-size distribution and concentration of total organic carbon and selected persistent organic pollutants.

Download the article to read their recommendations on the type of sampling technique that is most suitable for the nature of the sample and the analyte – it’s free to access for 4 weeks:

Effects of sampling techniques on physical parameters and concentrations of selected persistent organic pollutants in suspended matter
Thorsten Pohlert, Gudrun Hillebrand and Vera Breitung
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, Advance Article
DOI: 10.1039/C1EM10045A, Paper

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

HOT: asking the right questions to understand global climate change

Understanding the impact of long term human exposure to organic contaminants in the Arctic as a result of global climate change  is no mean feat – we barely understand the complicated Northern ecosystem as it is.  This comprehensive review from James Armitage and colleagues at the University of Toronto carefully outlines our existing knowledge of the system – and the gaps in it.

Their goal is to identify the key research questions that must be answered in order to increase our ability to see what the future holds for a warmer Arctic – why not check out the article today, you might get some ideas for your next project!

This article is free to access for the next four weeks:

Global climate change and contaminants—an overview of opportunities and priorities for modelling the potential implications for long-term human exposure to organic compounds in the Arctic
James M. Armitage, Cristina L. Quinn and Frank Wania
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, Advance Article
DOI: 10.1039/C1EM10131E

Why not also take a look at this review article by Susan Nash at Griffith University, describing the challenges faced by the research community in obtaining accurate information on the impact of persistent organic pollutants in Antarctica:

Persistent organic pollutants in Antarctica: current and future research priorities
Susan Bengtson Nash
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 497-504

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

An interview with Richard Luthy

Richard Luthy is the Silas H Palmer professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University, US. His interests include water quality and water reuse for ecosystem and human requirements

What inspired you to become an environmental scientist?
From an early age, I was influenced by my father who gave me gifts that inspired my curiosity. At one time, I had a gigantic chemistry set and used to do the experiments in the garage. I later went on to study chemical engineering. In the late 1960s, there was a race to the moon and a race to the bottom of the ocean. Jacques Cousteau was very active then and, almost on a whim, I decided I wanted to study ocean engineering. At that time, the Vietnam War had started – I was advised that it was better to volunteer than be drafted, so I volunteered for the navy civil engineer corps and became a deep sea diver leading a team in underwater construction. By the early 1970s, the US Environmental Protection Agency was founded and the Clean Water Act was passed. Around this time, I read Rachel Carson’s book about the dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane – or DDT – problem, Silent Spring. Being in the military gave me time to think about my future and environmental issues and I decided that on leaving the navy, I would do a PhD in environmental engineering.

What’s your main focus?
I’ve always had an interest in physical chemical processes and in trying to understand what mechanisms are at work in environmental systems such as sediments and wetlands. Everything is connected in natural systems – some connections are more important than others and we need to try to quantify these. The use of modelling can then enable you to make predictions about the system. My work is focused particularly on water quality.

What’s the most exciting thing about the work you do?

I enjoy working with colleagues from other disciplines, including biology and the social sciences. We’re looking at how to manage contaminants in sediments and I’ve learned a lot about aquatic biology, which you need to understand as well as how compounds are taken up and how we can control the availability of contaminants in sediments. Better management and use of our water resources are two of the most important problems in the western United States. It has been exciting partnering with excellent colleagues in the various disciplines and by working together, we have been able to put forward proposals to address the challenges ahead.

What’s the next big challenge?
In California, the water infrastructure is old, fragile and needs replacement. Back in the 1950s, we pumped water all over the place but now we’ve got to think about energy costs and the competing needs of agriculture and other human activities. Of course, part of the solution will come from technology that requires less energy. We are also thinking more about ecosystems. For example, the issue is no longer about not killing fish with discharge from wastewater treatment plants, we now have to consider how to leave the fish with enough water to live in. Ecosystems have an equal claim to water as industry and agriculture and we have to find a way of satisfying these competing claims.

There are issues with regard to management and institutions. In California, there are around 500 different major water suppliers, each with their own pricing structure. That makes it difficult to introduce a new water process or system since you have to discuss the changes with all those different bodies. Also, we view groundwater as a separate entity to surface water, but they’re connected. Having one set of laws that govern groundwater and another set for surface water makes the management of both resources much more difficult. Financial costs are the biggest hurdle in introducing improvements in water reuse, so it’s important to have business models that help us recover these costs.

Another issue is how we deal with climate change and risk in the future. There are risks from natural phenomena and from intentional acts and in the end you want a system that is robust and resilient. In the field of water quality and supply, we can either do things differently or just keep muddling along. Human society needs water and changes will happen anyway in how we maintain our water supplies, but ideally you like that change to happen in a way that is well planned, cost effective and serves the various needs I’ve described.

To read more see the Chemistry World story.

Articles of interest:

New methods to monitor emerging chemicals in the drinking water production chain
Annemarie van Wezel, Margreet Mons and Wouter van Delft, J. Environ. Monit., 2010, 12, 80
DOI: 10.1039/b912979k

Implementation of E.U. Water Framework Directive: source assessment of metallic substances at catchment levels

Ho-Sik Chon, Dieudonne-Guy Ohandja and Nikolaos Voulvoulis, J. Environ. Monit., 2010, 12, 36
DOI: 10.1039/b907851g

Fate and removal of estrogens in municipal wastewater
LeeAnn Racz and Ramesh K. Goel, J. Environ. Monit., 2010, 12, 58
DOI: 10.1039/b917298j

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

HOT: addressing key issues for sustainable agriculture

In this Perspective article David Lindenmayer (The Australian National University) and Gene Likens (Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies) prevent their view on  developing effective monitoring programs for agriculture.

The article was written in response to an opinion piece published in Nature proposing a global network for agricultural monitoring, which the authors believe fails to successfully address this important issue.  They argue that the framework proposed by Sachs et al is likely to be ineffective, due to their analysis of previous monitoring programs.  They present a new framework, based on their research which aims to understand change in environmental phenomena in agricultural ecosystems and answer critical questions about sustainable agriculture.

This interesting piece is currently free to access for 4 weeks – why not read it and give us your opinion?

Effective monitoring of agriculture
David B. Lindenmayer and Gene E. Likens
J. Environ. Monit., 2011, Advance Article
DOI: 10.1039/C0EM00691B

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)