Author Archive

The winner of the 2025 EES Lectureship: Professor Derya Baran

We are delighted to announce that the 2025 EES Lectureship has been awarded to Professor Derya Baran

 

 

Established in 2012, the Lectureship recognises outstanding emerging investigators working in an energy research topic within the scope of Energy & Environmental Science (EES), providing a platform to showcase their research to the wider scientific community. The EES Lectureship is awarded annually through a process whereby nominations of candidates are made by you – our fantastic community.

This year’s EES Lectureship winner is Professor Derya Baran!

 

Derya Baran, rooted to Turkey, is an Associate Professor in the Materials Science & Engineering Program at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), with joint appointments in the Chemistry and Computer & Electrical Engineering programs. Her research group OMEGALAB (https://www.omegalabresearch.com/) focus on engineering hybrid and organic solution processed semiconductors for energy capture and conversion. Baran was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry in 2022, received Talented 12 Chemists recognition given by American Chemical Society and C&EN in 2020 and she is part of Global Young Academy (GYA) to give more voice to early career scientists across the globe. She co-founded ‘iyris’, where she serves as the Chief Engineer, advancing materials for sustainable technologies for hot climates. Her accolades involve Boston Consultancy Group V60 Innovators Award and Climate Action 15 ambassador listed in Business Insider in 2024. Baran is an elect member of Board of Directors of Materials Research Society (MRS), the largest materials science community globally.

 

I am humbled and honoured to receive the 2025 EES Lectureship. I would like to thank my team members (from OMEGALAB) for sharing the passion with me for a better world and my mentors for supporting me during my academic journey.” – Professor Derya Baran, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

 

 

Read Derya’s recent work in the journal:

 

Elucidating the role of heterojunction in pristine non-fullerene acceptor organic solar cells

Anirudh Sharma, Julien Gorenflot, Han Xu, José P. Jurado, Shahidul Alam, Diego Rosas Villalva, Xun Pan, Jules Bertrandie, Prem D. Nayak, Yakun He, Maryam Alqurashi, Ying Luo, Mats R. Andersson, Oskar J. Sandberg, Frederic Laquai and Derya Baran

Energy Environ. Sci., 2025,18, 7610-7623. DOI: 10.1039/D5EE02324F

 

Deciphering the interplay between tin vacancies and free carriers in the ion transport of tin-based perovskites

Luis Huerta Hernandez, Luis Lanzetta, Anna M. Kotowska, Ilhan Yavuz, Nikhil Kalasariya, Badri Vishal, Marti Gibert-Roca, Matthew Piggott, David J. Scurr, Stefaan De Wolf, Martin Stolterfoht and Derya Baran

Energy Environ. Sci., 2025,18, 4787-4799. DOI: 10.1039/D5EE00632E

 

Synergistic cooperation between photovoltaic and thermoelectric effects in solar cells

Ping Fu, Dong Yang, Yihua Chen, Ruixue Lu, Md Azimul Haque, Yucheng Liu, Yaoyao Han, Hui Li, Ruotian Chen, Jieqiong Liu, Wei Qin, Luis Huerta Hernandez, Fengtao Fan, Kaifeng Wu, Derya Baran, Huanping Zhou and Can Li

Energy Environ. Sci., 2025,18, 7082-7088. DOI: 10.1039/D5EE01548K

 

On behalf of the Energy & Environmental Science (EES) Editorial Board and Editorial Office, we extend our sincerest congratulations to Derya and wish her continued successes!

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Our latest tools for authors are here

Here at the Royal Society of Chemistry, we want to make the publishing experience as an author as easy and transparent as possible. We’re therefore delighted to introduce two great new features for you when publishing with us: concurrent editing and transparent peer review!

Concurrent editing and Transparent Peer Review are both available on Energy & Environmental Science, Sustainable Energy & Fuels and Energy Advances.

Concurrent Editing

Concurrent editing is a new tool enabling you and your co-authors to work on an accepted manuscript’s corrections at the same time, while corresponding authors can track, review and approve all changes. Find out more.

The option to share access with co-authors will be listed on the initial instructions panel and tracked on the workflow and editing panel as you work on your corrections together.

To use concurrent editing, the corresponding author can share the proof with any co-authors using the “Invite Collaborators” feature in Proof Central. This will give each invited author a unique link, allowing their changes to be tracked and all authors to work on corrections at the same time. The corresponding author can then review and approve all changes before submitting the final corrections. You can find full instructions on Proof Central.

Alternatively, if you would prefer to supply proof corrections by annotating the PDF, this option will still be available and can be done through Proof Central, where an editor will apply the corrections on your behalf.

Transparent Peer Review

Transparent peer review is now offered to authors at submission and throughout peer review. If you opt in during the submission or peer review process, the editor’s decision letter, reviewers’ comments and authors’ responses for all versions of the manuscript are published alongside the article under an Open Access Creative Commons licence (CC-BY).

You can change your mind about transparent peer review at any point prior to acceptance. Reviewer comments remain anonymous unless the individual chooses to sign their report.

The Royal Society of Chemistry supports the principles of open science, which include working towards a more open and transparent research culture. Transparent peer review is an important strand of our commitment to open science.

Transparent peer review serves to shed light on the aspects of the journal publication process that are usually hidden. The benefits include:

  • Increasing transparency in editorial decision-making.
  • Readers can learn from the editors’ and reviewers’ insights, and the published peer reviews can serve as an educational tool for those new to peer review.
  • Showcasing the hard work and effort of editors and reviewers in evaluating a manuscript, and of the authors in revising their work in response.
  • Encouraging higher-quality and more constructive reviewer comments.

Find out more in this video https://youtu.be/-GvnyVZMNmk or on the RSC webpage: https://rsc.org/journals-books-databases/author-and-reviewer-hub/process-and-policies/#peerreview

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)