Archive for May, 2019

Through a cheaper ‘book of life’

Mapping the human genome project has been one of the world’s largest scientific collaborations. Completing the full genome sequencing for “the book of life” took more than 10 years with the efforts of 1000’s scientists and a budget of $3 billion. About 20 years after the finalization of this enormous project, it is now possible to complete a full human genome sequencing within 8 days for about $1,000 thanks to more advanced sequencing tools. Further improvements in genome sequencing tools are still warranted today because the genome sequencing field has been embraced by many more applications, including forensics, disease modeling & identification, and personalized medicine (e.g., identifying the genes that cause a medicine to work in one patient but not in another).

Initial sequencing technologies relied on standard DNA electrophoresis techniques such as slab gels and capillaries, allowing for the preparation of only small numbers of samples at a time. The sample preparation limitation was the primary reason for the increased costs and processing duration during the human genome project. Many efforts have been directed towards improving sample preparation techniques in the last decades. As the first step, electrophoresis techniques have been optimized to boost the sample throughput with user-friendly, smaller, and functional platforms. Traditional DNA separation gels, which have been used as the golden standard for many decades, have been replaced by microfabricated post arrays and nanometer-scale deterministic lateral displacement arrays.

A nice example of nanometer-scale deterministic lateral displacement arrays has been demonstrated recently by researchers from IBM T.J. Watson Research Center and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, USA. In this work, the researchers fractioned DNA in the range of 100-10.000 base pairs with a size-selective resolution of 200 base pairs. To achieve that, four different microchip configurations were fabricated on silicon wafers, where the array and nanopillar sizes were tuned for each configuration to obtain the optimum separation performance for the selected range of DNA fragments. Each configuration contained several separate arrays to conduct independent runs in a single chip. Instead of applying an electric field, the researchers applied pressure-driven force to separate the fragments. This strategy is particularly useful for separating non-charged species without being affected by buffer conditions (e.g., ionic strength).

The separation mechanism in the nanometer-scale deterministic lateral displacement array is simple: If the size of a DNA fragment is larger than the diameter of the pillars, the fragment is deflected towards the collection wall at a large angle, also called the bump mode. If the size of a DNA fragment is smaller than the diameter of the pillars, the fragment migrates at an angle nominally zero, termed as the zig zag mode. In such a system, diffusion of DNA fragments lead to intermediate migration angles, termed as the partial-bump mode. Different sizes of DNA fragments could be separated in the array since the fragments will follow distinct trajectories thanks to the existence of different modes. Figure 1 summarizes the separation mechanisms and gives an outline for the nanometer-scale deterministic lateral displacement array.

In the nanometer-scale deterministic lateral displacement array, the gap sizes were tuned from microscale to nanoscale only, without application of any other molecules that could change the DNA diffusion behavior, ionic strength (changing the effective gap distances). In such a setting, the researchers identified, for the first time, the flow velocity-dependence of different fragment lengths. Mainly, changing flow velocity caused a transition between bump and zig zag modes for the given size range of different DNA fragments: Slow speeds lead to partial-bump mode, and high speeds lead to the collapse of all DNA fragments to zigzag mode. The nanometer-scale deterministic lateral displacement array could also be used as a purification tool with 75% recovery and 3-fold concentration enhancement of DNA fragments. This tool could be used effectively for preparing next-generation sequencing libraries, on-chip DNA characterization, and circulating DNA characterization applications.

 

Figure 1. The nanometer-scale deterministic lateral displacement array and DNA separation mechanism at different flow velocities.

To download the full article for free* click the link below:

Gel-on-a-chip: continuous, velocity-dependent DNA separation using nanoscale lateral displacement

Benjamin H. Wunsch, Sung-Cheol Kim, Stacey M. Gifford, Yann Astier, Chao Wang, Robert L. Bruce, Jyotica V. Patel, Elizabeth A. Duch, Simon Dawes, Gustavo Stolovitzky and  Joshua T. Smith, Lab Chip, 2018, Lab on a Chip Articles

DOI: 10.1039/c8lc01053f

 

About the Webwriter

Burcu Gumuscu is a researcher in Mesoscale Chemical Systems Group at the University of Twente in the Netherlands. Her research interests include the development of microfluidic devices for quantitative analysis of proteins from single-cells, next-generation sequencing, compartmentalized organ-on-chip studies, and desalination of water on the microscale.

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Lab on a Chip thematic collection on droplet-based single cell sequencing

Lab on a Chip is delighted to share with you our Thematic Collection on droplet-based single-cell sequencing.

The droplet-based single-cell sequencing field is advancing very rapidly. Large numbers of studies are underway to collect and explore the new information that is now accessible with single-cell RNA-seq. Improvements to the microfluidics are also advancing rapidly. This collection of papers and reviews focusses on the between the technological advancements and high impact applications of droplet-based single-cell sequencing.

This topical and exciting collection is collated by Thought leader Dave Weitz and the Lab on a Chip Editorial Board. The collection is introduced in a perspective on single cell sequencing by the Thought leader Dave Weitz, and in two editorials, one on “InDrops and Drop-seq” by Allon Klein and Evan Macosko and one on “an engineer and business person’s perspective” by businessman and engineer Mark Gilligan.

Read the full collection at: http://rsc.li/drop-sc-seq

Below is a selection of content highlights featured in the collection. In addition, all papers are free to read until 31st May*

Perspective

Droplet-based single cell RNAseq tools: a practical guide

Robert Salomon, David Gallego-Ortega, et al.

Critical Review

Finding a helix in a haystack: nucleic acid cytometry with droplet microfluidics

Iain C. Clark and Adam R. Abate

Paper

High throughput gene expression profiling of yeast colonies with microgel-culture Drop-seq

Leqian Liu, Adam R. Abate, et al.

Paper

Simplified Drop-seq workflow with minimized bead loss using a bead capture and processing microfluidic chip

Marjan Biočanin, Bart Deplancke, et al.

Lab on a Chip is the leading journal publishing significant and original work related to miniaturisation, at the micro- and nano-scale, of interest to a multidisciplinary readership with an Journal Impact Factor of 5.995**. The journal is guided by Editor-in-Chief Abraham (Abe) Lee (University of California, Irvine) who is supported by our team of Associate Editors (Yoon-Kyoung Cho, Petra Dittrich, Hang Lu, Jianhua Qin, Manabu Tokeshi, Joel Voldman and Aaron Wheeler).

We hope you enjoy reading the papers within this Thematic Collection and we welcome future submissions on droplet-based single-cell sequencing.

Dolomite/Lab on a Chip Pioneers of Miniaturization Lectureshipdeadline approaching-nominate a colleague now!

Organ-on a-chip systems- translating concept into practice thematic collectionSubmit now

Organ-,body- and disease-on-a-chip thematic collectionRead now

Personalised medicine:liquid biopsyRead now

Lab on a Chip Emerging Investigator Series Apply now

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Lab on a Chip thematic collection on personalised medicine-liquid biopsy

Lab on a Chip is delighted to share with you our Thematic Collection on personalised medicine-liquid biopsy.

This collection of papers and reviews focusses on the interface between the technological advancements and high impact applications of liquid biopsy technologies. This collection is collated by Thought Leaders Mehmet Toner and Stefanie Jeffrey and the Lab on a Chip Editorial Board and is introduced in an Editorial by the Thought Leaders on Liquid biopsy: a perspective for probing blood for cancer

Read the full collection at: http://rsc.li/liquid-biopsy

Below is a selection of content highlights featured in the collection. In addition, all papers are free to read until 31st May*

Tutorial Review

Cancer diagnosis: from tumor to liquid biopsy and beyond

Ramanathan Vaidyanathan, Chwee Teck Lim, et al.

Critical Review

Circulating tumor DNA and liquid biopsy: opportunities, challenges, and recent advances in detection technologies

Lena Gorgannezhad, Nam-Trung Nguyen, Muhammad J. A. Shiddiky et al.

Paper

Dynamic CTC phenotypes in metastatic prostate cancer models visualized using magnetic ranking cytometry

Leyla Kermanshah, Shana O. Kelley et al.

Paper

An ultrasensitive test for profiling circulating tumor DNA using integrated comprehensive droplet digital detection

Chen-Yin Ou, Timothy J. Abram, Weian Zhao et al.

Paper

Cancer marker-free enrichment and direct mutation detection in rare cancer cells by combining multi-property isolation and microfluidic concentration

Soo Hyeon Kim, Teruo Fujii et al.

Paper

Urine-based liquid biopsy: non-invasive and sensitive AR-V7 detection in urinary EVs from patients with prostate cancer

Hyun-Kyung Woo, Hong Koo Ha, Yoon-Kyoung Cho et al.

 

Lab on a Chip is the leading journal publishing significant and original work related to miniaturisation, at the micro- and nano-scale, of interest to a multidisciplinary readership with an Journal Impact Factor of 5.995**. The journal is guided by Editor-in-Chief Abraham (Abe) Lee (University of California, Irvine) who is supported by our team of Associate Editors (Yoon-Kyoung Cho, Petra Dittrich, Hang Lu, Jianhua Qin, Manabu Tokeshi, Joel Voldman and Aaron Wheeler).

We hope you enjoy reading the papers within this Thematic Collection!

Keep up to date with Lab on a Chip throughout the year by signing up for free table of contents alerts and monthly e-newsletters.

Dolomite/Lab on a Chip Pioneers of Miniaturization Lectureshipdeadline approaching-nominate a colleague now!

Organ-on a-chip systems- translating concept into practice thematic collectionSubmit now

Organ-,body- and disease-on-a-chip thematic collectionRead now

Droplet-based single-cell sequencingRead now

Lab on a Chip Emerging Investigator Series Apply now

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Emerging Investigator Series – Mathieu Odijk

Mathieu Odijk is an associate Professor at the University of Twente running his own research theme on Micro- and Nanodevices for Chemical Analysis. He received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Twente under the guidance of Albert van den Berg for his work on electrochemical microreactors for drug screening and proteomics applications in 2011. He has broaden his scope by various research visits at EPFL Lausanne (2012), the Wyss Institute at Harvard (2013), and MIT (2014).

The common aim of his research is to design novel devices to measure chemical quantities, pushing boundaries in applications to explore unknown territory. Often, this relates to faster, or better spatially resolved measurements at lower concentrations in small volumes. Micro- and nanofabrication techniques are used to enhance electrochemical, optical or mass spectrometric readout. The ultimate goal is to create new, yet robust tools for routine use in the lab or point-of-care applications.

Read Mathieu Odijk ’s Emerging Investigator article “A miniaturized push–pull-perfusion probe for few-second sampling of neurotransmitters in the mouse brain” and find out more about him in the interview below:

How has your research evolved from your first article to your most recent Emerging Investigator article?

I have nice memories about my first paper, as it was also submitted to Lab on Chip and immediately accepted without revisions (only one small question from 1 of the referee’s). The topic of that first paper was about the design of an electrochemical microreactor to study oxidative conversions in drug metabolism studies. We have been quite successful with that topic, now extending it also in the direction of studying electrochemical oxidative protein cleavage, and disulphide bond reduction using e.g. spectroelectrochemical means.

Many “ingredients” included in that first paper also are present in current projects such as microfluidics, advanced cleanroom fabrication, and analytical chemistry. These ingredients also form a key component of the focus area of my own research group (Micro- and nanodevices for Chemical Analysis).

 What aspect of your work are you most excited about at the moment?

It is my aim to push the boundaries of existing analytical tools with respect to limit detection, spatial or temporal resolution, or enhancing the number of repeats using high-throughput technology. I’m really excited about this latest paper demonstrating a miniaturized push-pull perfusion probe, as it is indeed improving both the spatial and temporal resolution by at least 1 order of magnitude compared to commercially available probes. As such, it is a nice showcase of what can be achieved by microfluidics.

In your opinion, what are the most important questions to be asked/answered in this field of research? 

I think it is really important to focus on the final application, and find good collaboration partners. If I take this push-pull perfusion probe as example, this research originated from discussions with neuroscientist who complained about a lack of temporal information from their existing microdialysis probes. However, quite a number of papers that describe probes with microfluidic channels only demonstrate in-vitro results. As we also found out in our project, bridging the gap towards in-vivo is certainly not trivial. It requires compromises in the technological area which you would not address if you stick to in-vitro experiments.

More generally I believe that the field has matured; lab on chip technology has become a means to achieve a higher goal. In this case this higher goal is to study neurochemical processes in the brain in more detail. However, I think this project also clearly demonstrates that there can be a lot of science in engineering. In this case we had to overcome challenges in microfabrication, fluid dynamics, mass-transport, protein chemistry, and adsorption kinetics.

What do you find most challenging about your research?

What I find really interesting is that my research is very multi-disciplinary in nature, crossing traditional boundaries such as “chemistry”, “physics”, or “biology”. However, that also poses a challenge as it is easy to develop a blind spot if you are exploring a new field of research. Again I would like to stress the importance of a good collaboration with experts in these fields to prevent failures at an early stage.

In which upcoming conferences or events may our readers meet you?

That is easy: I always try to attend MicroTAS.

How do you spend your spare time?

I’m a father of two small children, aged 1 and 4. If they leave me some spare time (and energy), I like to do woodworking, cycling, and indoor climbing. I also really like outdoors ice skating, but global warming is unfortunately interfering with the number of days ice skating is possible in the Netherlands.

Which profession would you choose if you were not a scientist?

I always wanted to be an inventor, with teacher as a close runner-up. I guess becoming a scientist is actually pretty close to that childhood dream. Any alternative profession should allow me to be able to either create new things, or educate other people (or both).

Can you share one piece of career-related advice or wisdom with other early career scientists?

At various points in my tenure track, I felt pressure to perform. This can be stressful and is most definitely counter-productive. Try to keep seeing/finding the fun in science, e.g. by asking your PhD students to share their Eureka moments in the lab with you. All the rest is of lesser importance.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)