Archive for October, 2011

Top ten most accessed articles in September

This month sees the following articles in PPS that are in the top ten most accessed:-

UV wavelength-dependent DNA damage and human non-melanoma and melanoma skin cancer
Gerd P. Pfeifer and Ahmad Besaratinia
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2011, Advance Article, DOI: 10.1039/C1PP05144J

Engineered photoreceptors as novel optogenetic tools
Andreas Möglich and Keith Moffat
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2010, 9, 1286-1300, DOI: 10.1039/C0PP00167H, Perspective

Targeted photodynamic therapy of breast cancer cells using antibody-phthalocyanine-gold nanoparticle conjugates
Tanya Stuchinskaya, Miguel Moreno, Michael J. Cook, Dylan R. Edwards and David A. Russell
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2011, 10, 822-831, DOI: 10.1039/C1PP05014A

Effects of UV radiation on aquatic ecosystems and interactions with climate change

D.-P. Häder, E. W. Helbling, C. E. Williamson and R. C. Worrest
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2011, 10, 242-260, DOI: 10.1039/C0PP90036B

Human safety review of “nano” titanium dioxide and zinc oxide
Karsten Schilling, Bobbie Bradford, Dominique Castelli, Eric Dufour, J. Frank Nash, Wolfgang Pape, Stefan Schulte, Ian Tooley, Jeroen van den Bosch and Florian Schellauf
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2010, 9, 495-509, DOI: 10.1039/B9PP00180H

Kinetic studies on visible-light-switchable photochromic fluorophores based on diarylethenes
Britta Seefeldt, Kai Altenhöner, Oliver Tosic, Thomas Geisler, Markus Sauer and Jochen Mattay
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2011, 10, 1488-1495, DOI: 10.1039/C1PP05051F

A new photo-switchable ”on-off” host-guest system
Youngkook Kim, Young Ho Ko, Minseon Jung, Narayanan Selvapalam and Kimoon Kim
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2011, 10, 1415-1419, DOI: 10.1039/C1PP05055A

CdS-sensitized TiO2 nanocorals: hydrothermal synthesis, characterization, application
S. S. Mali, S. K. Desai, D. S. Dalavi, C. A. Betty, P. N. Bhosale and P. S. Patil
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2011, Advance Article, DOI: 10.1039/C1PP05084B

Supramolecular architecture of tetrathiafulvalene-bridged bis(ß-cyclodextrin) with porphyrin and its electron transfer behaviors
Jean-François Doré and Marie-Christine Chignol
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2011, Advance Article, DOI: 10.1039/C1PP05186E

Tanning salons and skin cancer
Jean-François Doré and Marie-Christine Chignol
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2011, Advance Article, DOI: 10.1039/C1PP05186E

Why not take a look at the articles today and blog your thoughts and comments below.

Fancy submitting an article to PPS? Then why not submit to us today or alternatively email us your suggestions.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Iron, oxidative stress and solar ultraviolet A radiation

C1PP05204GA recently published perspective from Charareh Pourzand, Rex Tyrrell, co-editor-in-chief of PPS, and co-workers at the University of Bath gives an overview of recent findings on intracellular labile iron (LI) distribution and trafficking.  Using UVA radiation as an example, it also discusses mechanisms and consequences of oxidant-induced alterations in the intracellular pool of LI.  This perspective forms part of an upcoming themed issue on UVA.

Iron is a vital nutrient and is required for a wide variety of cellular processes due to its facile redox chemistry and affinity to oxygen.  However, when the redox-active chelatable ‘labile’ form exceeds the normal binding capacity of the cell this labile iron (LI) can become toxic.  In the presence of reactive oxygen species LI can catalyse the formation of oxygen-derived free radicals that overwhelm the cell’s antioxidant defence mechanism and result in cell damage.  Although intracellular iron homeostasis is tightly regulated acute exposure of skin cells to UVA induces an increase in intracellular LI and this appears to play a key role in the increased susceptibility of skin cells to UVA-mediated oxidative membrane damage and necrotic cell death.

To find out more follow the link below.  Full text is FREE until November 11th.

Iron, oxidative stress and the example of solar ultraviolet A radiation
Asma Aroun, Julia Li Zhong, Rex M. Tyrrell and Charareh Pourzand
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2012, DOI: 10.1039/C1PP05204G

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Investigations into the gender bias in skin cancer development reveal male unresponsiveness to UVA radiation

C1PP05224ANew insights into mechanisms behind gender differences in skin cancer development are revealed in this article from Vivienne Reeve and co-workers from Sydney, Australia.  A contributing factor for skin cancer development in mice and humans is immunosuppression as a result of UVB light; whilst the contribution of UVA is controversial it has been shown to antagonise immunosuppression by UVB.  One of the mechanisms for this UVA protection which has been demonstrated in mice is mediated via oestrogen receptor-β signalling, suggesting a gender bias in photoimmune response to UVA.

Gender bias is tested in this study by comparing the UV-induced inflammatory and immune responses in male and female hairless mice. The study uses solar simulated radiation (SSUV) to induce sunburn, the resulting inflammatory oedema is measured through the increase in irradiated skinfold thickness and levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-6 in the epidermis.  Immune function was assessed by the contact hypersensitivity (CHS) reaction and its suppression by SSUV was related to the level of expression of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10 in the epidermis.

Results showed that although male mice had less intense sunburn with lower expression of IL-6 the CHS reaction was more severely suppressed by SSUV than females and this also correlated with increased epidermal expression of immunosuppressive IL-10. Exposure to UVB alone had equal effects in male and female mice, however, UVA irradiation induced immunoprotection in females but this effect was reduced or not present in males.  The results indicate that males have a relative unresponsiveness to the photoimmune protective effects of UVA.  This could explain the known gender bias in skin cancer development in both mice and humans.

Interested in knowing more?  Read the full article here.  Free until 4th November.

Gender differences in UV-induced inflammation and immunosuppression in mice reveal male unresponsiveness to UVA radiation
Vivienne E. Reeve, Munif Allanson, Diane Domanski and Nicole Painter
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2011, DOI: 10.1039/C1PP05224A

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)