Archive for the ‘HOT Articles’ Category

Latest HOT, Review and Open Access content from ESWRT

 

 

 

 

We are delighted to share with you a hand-picked selection of papers recently published in Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology (ESWRT).

HOT papers – as recommended by our referees

Biodegradation and attenuation of MIB and 2,4-D in drinking water biologically active sand and activated carbon filters
Kyle Shimabuku et al

Antifouling UV-treated GO/PES hollow fiber membranes in a membrane bioreactor (MBR)
Miao Yu et al

Oily bilge water treatment using DC/AC powered electrocoagulation
Zhiyong Jason Ren et al

Read more HOT papers at rsc.li/eswrt-hot

Reviews – timely and insightful overviews of water research and water technologies

Resource recovery and wastewater treatment modelling
Mark C. M. van Loosdrecht et al

 Guide for using green infrastructure in urban environments for stormwater management
Larissa Larsen et al

Membrane distillation crystallization for brine mining and zero liquid discharge: opportunities, challenges, and recent progress
Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran et al

Read more Reviews at rsc.li/eswrt-reviews

Open Access – read for free!

Evaluation of the novel substrate RUG™ for the detection of Escherichia coli in water from temperate (Zurich, Switzerland) and tropical (Bushenyi, Uganda) field sites
Timothy Julian et al

 Monitoring the integrity of reverse osmosis membranes using novel indigenous freshwater viruses and bacteriophages
Luc M. Hornstra et al

Waterworks-specific composition of drinking water disinfection by-products
Anna Andersson et al

Read more Open Access content at rsc.li/eswrt-oa

**************************************************

We hope you enjoy reading these papers, and we welcome your future submissions to the journal.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

GAC-sand or anthracite-sand biofilters, that is the question

The removal of biodegradable organic matter (BOM) from drinking water treatment plan effluents is a key issue in water treatment technology. BOM consists of oxygenated compounds such as carbohydrates, small carbonyls and carboxylic acids that are mainly produced during ozonation, a treatment performed to decrease the organic carbon content of the inflow. Biodegradable organic matter is an excellent carbon source and can foster microbial growth within the distribution system, leading to a decrease in the microbiological water quality.

Biofilters can help solving this problem. Different from conventional filters, biofilters are composed of an inert material, either anthracite, sand or granular activated carbon (GAC), which microorganisms can grow on. Common types include the GAC-sand and the anthracite-sand biofilters. As a general strategy, the raw water is first ozonated, leading to a decrease of organic carbon, but an increase in BOM. Then the BOM-rich water is circulated through the biofilter, where BOM is used as a substrate for microbial growth1.

Biofilters are in every respect “living organisms”, whose activity and effectiveness can change over time. Thus, a systematic evaluation of risks and benefits is of primary importance. Following the detection of free-living amoebas in GAC-sand filter effluents, de Vera et al. set a study with the aim of investigating the effect of biofilter media on the microbiological quality of the effluent and on the microbial community of the biofilters. Amoebas have not been thoroughly studied in drinking water biofilters, and also include pathogenic species that have recently been listed in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Contaminant Candidate List.

De Vera et al. collected water samples from an operating drinking water treatment plan that was equipped with both GAC-sand and anthracite-sand biofilters. They measured turbidity, particle counts and ATP counts in the effluent, concluding that the anthracite-sand biofilter was more effective in preventing biomass release – thus, the microbiological quality of the effluent was higher. According to the authors, this effect was due to the ability of the GAC-sand biofilters to quench residual chlorine, which was present in the biofilter influent. This allowed greater biomass development and biofilter activity, but also increased the release of microorganisms in the effluent.

Using molecular biology techniques, the authors analyzed the microbial community structure of the two filter types. Their results showed that substantially different bacterial and invertebrate communities are present in the two biofilters, with the GAC-sand filters hosting a richer and more diverse bacterial community. Instead, a high fraction of chlorine-resistant bacteria was present in the anthracite-sand biofilters, as the result of the selective pressure caused by the residual chlorine.

In conclusion, the authors recommend the use of anthracite-sand over the GAC-sand biofilters, as the microbiological quality of the resulting effluent was higher. Despite being often preferred over the anthracite-sand filter, as they are more effective in degrading contaminants of emerging concern2, the GAC-sand biofilters can accumulate and release pathogenic organisms, potentially posing risks to public health.

To download the full article, click the link below:

Impact of upstream chlorination on filter performance and microbial community structure of GAC and anthracite biofilters

Glen Andrew de Vera,  Daniel Gerrity, Mitchell Stoker, Wilbur Frehner and Eric C. Wert

Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2018, 4, 1133

DOI: 10.1039/c8ew00115d


About the Webwriter:

Rachele Ossola is a PhD student in the Environmental Chemistry group at ETH Zurich. Her research focuses on photochemistry of dissolved organic matter in the natural environment.

 

 

 


Additional references:

(1) Terry and Summers, Water Research 2018, 128, 234-245

(2) Ma et al., Water Research 2018, 146, 67-76

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Are current water treatment practices favouring the rise of antibiotic resistance?

The answer is fortunately no, based on the findings of a recent article published in Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology.

Drinking water distribution systems (DWDS) rely on the use of disinfecting agents to prevent the outbreak of diseases carried by waterborne pathogens. A commonly employed chemical agent is free chlorine, however health risks associated with the production of disinfection by-products (DBPs) have favoured the use of chloramines as secondary disinfectants. Chloramines provide longer lasting levels of residual disinfectant, but leave the system prone to nitrification, a process which can affect drinking water quality. Nitrification, and the so-called ‘chlorine burns’, treatments used to rectify the system, are considered disturbances to the microbial communities which populate a DWDS and have been linked to the development of pathogenic microbial agents and the spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs).

Graphical Abstract

The present study operated a simulated drinking water distribution system through the typical phases of: normal operation, failure (i.e. nitrification), and rectification in order to study the microbiome and its response to the mentioned disturbances. Under normal operation the bacterial community revealed itself to be complex, with a small number of dominant species (the core microbiome) accompanied by a great number of species which together comprise only a small portion of the community (the rare biosphere).

The drastic changes in DWDS conditions realised during progression through the various operational phases allowed for the study of the conditionally rare taxa (species normally present in low abundance, but which become dominant under certain conditions). For example, the nitrifier Nitrospira spp., present in very low abundance or under the detection limit during normal operation with chloramine disinfectant, becomes present to noticeable levels during system failure. Nitrification is associated with the accelerated decay of chloramine which makes it difficult to maintain appropriate disinfectant levels under failure conditions and offers an opportunity for certain pathogens to multiply. One such pathogen, Legionella pneumophila, is over 10 times more abundant in free-chlorine treated water in the absence of secondary chloramine disinfectant. Such observations suggest that monitoring of conditionally rare taxa could predict nitrification in chloraminated DWDSs and help prevent potential dangerous situations in which public health becomes threatened by waterborne pathogens.

Genome analysis for a number of isolates from the core microbiome revealed the presence of a large number of gene clusters (165) with similarity to known ARGs. Combined these could offer their hosts resistance to a broad range of antibiotics such as: erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, rifampin, fluoroquinolone, and others. Transfer of these genes to human-related bacteria is noted as being highly unlikely though, and any antibiotic resistance conferred to be limited to the host organism. The study also considered the effect of disturbances on the biofilm populations of the DWDS; previously biofilms had been described as reservoirs of antibiotic resistant bacteria, but with little information being available on their role in the spreading of antibiotic resistance within DWDSs. Three strains of M. chelonae were selected from the biofilm for genomic analysis following disturbance events. The genome was found to be conserved throughout the operational stages with no changes in the ARG ensemble either, in contrast to the expectations of selection pressure causing mutations.

Finally, the microbial community proved to be resilient returning back to its initial state during the second normal operation phase. In conclusion, the study analysed both the dominant and minor bacterial components in the DWDS ecosystem, and monitored their response to changes in physicochemical properties of the environment. This showed how opportunities arise for the spread of waterborne pathogens, but found no evidence for the development of antibiotic resistance within the DWDS system.

To read the full article for free* click on the link below:

Resilience of microbial communities in a simulated drinking water distribution system subjected to disturbances: role of conditionally rare taxa and potential implications for antibiotic-resistant bacteria
V. Gomez-Alvarez, S. Pfaller, J. G. Pressman, D. G. Wahman and   R. P. Revetta
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2016, Advance Article
DOI: 10.1039/C6EW00053C

—————-

About the webwriter

Dan Mercea is a PhD student in the Fuchter group at Imperial College London. He is working on developing enantioselective FLP catalysis.

—————-

*Access is free through a registered RSC account – register here

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

From Zero to Hero: achieving energy-positive municipal water supply

In a Perspective article recently published in Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, Englehardt et al. discuss a new vision for municipal water management: Net-zero water (NZW), a system which aims at neither importing nor exporting water from the service area – a way forward for local water independence.

Even though water availability is high in many regions, many people are still lacking access to energy-inexpensive, clean water. There are several stressors affecting water resources. Increasing demand for clean water can be attributed to several global and local processes operating on different scales and with varying impact, such as industrialization, rapid population growth, climate change and environmental degradation. We are facing a grand challenge: a resource-constrained world where we need to make water management more sustainable.

Net-zero water management – a new paradigm for water management

A NZW system is a management water and wastewater scheme that neither withdraws nor releases significant flows of water outside of its service area, ranging from a single residential lot to a large urban water district. NZW management proposes that high-demand and high-population areas, such as urban areas, no longer consume water needed by downstream regions, nor depend on upstream regions for supply.

One main motivation for net-zero municipal water management, besides prevention of water shortages, is that it aims to be energy-positive; this means that it should retain and save more hot-water thermal energy in the water than the energy used for treatment processes. Consequently, there is a demand to decrease the energy demands from water and disposal of wastewater containing hot water thermal energy.

NZW management can be operationalized in almost any modern catchment basin through the use of direct potable reuse (DPR). With this method, recycled water is introduced into the raw water supply directly upstream of a water treatment plant without passing through a reservoir or aquifer (environmental buffer) or introduced directly into a potable water supply distribution system. These systems show good economic capacities in producing potable water from municipal wastewater.

A schematic of a contemporary water management compared to the vision of a Net-Zero treatment process from a household perspective.

From buzzword to business: where do we go from here?

Net-zero water management is first and foremost a new vision, although it is becoming practical and technologically achievable to reuse water via a wide range of applications. Current implementations may not be easily reproduced in the near future, especially outside of research and demonstration settings. The authors conclude that there are several important targets and goals that we need to consider for reaching proper implementation of NZW; there is a demand for regulatory standards, policies and commercialized technologies to take the steps from vision to operation, and to a wider adoption of NZW systems.

Public acceptance is key for implementation of NZW systems

Governing structures and regulatory processes require time to develop, and regulatory infrastructure is crucial for the development of cost-effective commercial equipment, hence public acceptance and engagement in NZW is vital for proper implementation of NZW systems, as stated authors state.

Do you have ideas or visions on how to further develop Net-zero water management? Are there other important factors to consider that the authors did not discuss? Please share your opinions by commenting below after you have read the paper for free*:

Net-zero Water management: achieving energy-positive municipal water supply
J. Englehardt, T. Wu, F. Bloetscher, Y. Deng, P. Pisani, S. Eilert, S. Elmir, T. Guo, J. Jacangelo, M. LeChevallier, H. Leverenz, E. Mancha, E. Plater-Zyberk, B. Sheikh, E. Steinle-Darling and G. Tchobanoglous.
Env. Sci: Water Res. Technol. 2016, Advance Article
DOI: 0.1039/C5EW00204D

—————-

About the webwriter:

Jesper Agrelius is a MSc student in Environmental Science at Linköping University, Sweden. His main interests regards environmental science, especially climate change and biogeochemistry. You can follow him on Twitter @JesperAgrelius.

—————-

*Access is free through a registered RSC account.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology team select their top papers from 2015!

2015 has been a successful first year for Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology – we have published an array of high-impact research and review articles from both leaders and emerging scientists in the field of water research. The major highlights from 2015 have been captured by Editor-in-Chief Professor David Cwiertny in his recent Editorial.

As a celebration of a successful first year of publication, the Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology team have selected their top papers from 2015, listed below. Congratulations to all the authors featured! These papers free to access with an RSC Publishing account – we hope you enjoy reading them.

Triclosan, chlorinated triclosan derivatives, and hydroxylated polybrominated diphenyl ethers (OH-BDEs) in wastewater effluents
R. Noah Hensley, Jill F. Kerrigan, Hao Pang, Paul R. Erickson, Matthew Grandbois, Kristopher McNeill and William A. Arnold, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015, 1, 316–325, DOI: 10.1039/C4EW00102H

Emerging investigators series: the source and fate of pandemic viruses in the urban water cycle
K. R. Wigginton, Y. Ye and R. M. Ellenberg, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015, 1, 735–746, DOI: 10.1039/C5EW00125K

Modeling approaches to predict removal of trace organic compounds by ozone oxidation in potable reuse applications
Minkyu Park, Tarun Anumol and Shane A. Snyder, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015, 1, 699–708, DOI: 10.1039/C5EW00120J

Some of our other highlights from 2015 include:

All content published in Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology in 2015 and 2016 is free to access with an RSC Publishing account – register for free here: http://pubs.rsc.org/en/account/register

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Using nanoparticle paper filters for inactivation of bacteria in contaminated waters

There is a critical need for inexpensive point-of-use methods (POU) for purifying drinking water in developing countries to prevent waterborne pathogens.

Microbial contamination of water causes the spread of avoidable water-borne diseases, such as cholera, giardiasis, gastroenteritis and cryptosporidiosis, highlighted by WHO in their guidelines for drinking water quality. The potential health consequences of microbial contamination are important to consider and may never be compromised, from catchment to customer.

Figure 1. Examples of pathogenic microorganisms in contaminated surface water (left)
and the effect of nano-enabled (AG or CU NP) paper filters on the contaminated water (right).

Drinking water quality in Limpopo, South Africa

The last 20 years have showed an increase in drinking water quality for South Africa, where 95% of the population are considered to have access to potable drinking water as of 2012. However, a lot of rural residents still do not have reliable access to potable water and Limpopo, the study area in a recently published article, is the most rural province in South Africa. This region is highly affected by a lack of potable water and as a result the rates of diarrhoea cases are much higher than the national average.

Silver and copper – ‘noble’ in many ways

For the first time in the field, a study by Dankovich et al., published in Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, demonstrates a novel and affordable technology for purifying drinking water. By using nano-enabled paper filters as a point-of-use method, the filters effectively inactivated coliform bacteria from contaminated water sources in Limpopo, South Africa.

The microbial water quality was improved by passing contaminated surface water from rural areas through nanoparticle paper filters which contained either AgNP (silver nanoparticles) or CuNP (copper nanoparticles). All of the AgNP and CuNP paper filters prominently reduced total coliform and E. Coli as compared to the untreated influent water, and E. coli bacteria were eliminated for the rural and urban medium samples.

Figure 2. Blotter papers (a) untreated, (b) with silver nanoparticles, and (c) with copper nanoparticles.
Note the scale: each paper is 6.5 cm by 6.5 cm and the filter cross section is 4.7 cm by 4.7 cm.

The problem of microbial contamination of water, turbidity and other pollutants from the natural sources studied in this specific research project are representative of many similar settings in the developing world and these filters show great promise as a water purifying option for resource-limited countries and regions.

The researchers raise important future directions for further development in the area are water purification by nano-enabled paper filters as a point-of-use method. Future research is needed to evaluate the design of practical and user-friendly filter holders, as well as address the practical challenges of implementing this paper filter technology in emergency/disaster relief settings and rural households.

Explore the exciting research regarding the nanoparticle paper filters in detail for free*:

Inactivation of bacteria from contaminated streams in Limpopo, South Africa by silver- or copper-nanoparticle paper filters
T. Dankovich, J. Levine, N. Potgieter, R. Dilingham and J. Smith
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2016, Advance Article
DOI: 10.1039/C5EW00188A



– Interested in more research regarding nano materials and the environment? Please visit our sister blog Environmental Science: Nano. Dr Marina Vance, webwriter in ES: Nano, explains how silver nanoparticles have antimicrobial “super powers”, and also highlights some environmental & health risks and opportunities of nanotechnology in the new Ted X Talk “The Good, the Bad, the Tiny”.

– Water quality is highlighted as one of several “Global Challenges” by the Royal Society of Chemistry. More resources on global, regional and local water quality are available here.

– The same researchers made a small Internet success last year with the viral spread of a project from the Water is Life organization, highlighted by magazines such as Wired, Slate and Smithsonian.




About the webwriter

Jesper Agrelius is a MSc student in Environmental Science at Linköping University, Sweden. His main interests regards environmental science, especially climate change and biogeochemistry. You can follow him on Twitter @JesperAgrelius.

—————-

*Access is free through a registered RSC account.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Leaving no one behind: Developing tools for faecal sludge management

Humanity faces a grand challenge – sanitation. Worldwide lack of access to basic sanitation is a widely recognized problem for human health, development, the economy and our environment.

Globally 2.4 billion people live without access to improved sanitation and the issue of sanitation lies at the root of many other challenges related to human development, such as education, public health and environmental degradation, and significantly alter economic growth.

Meeting the global sanitation challenge

Faecal Sludge Management (FSM) involves the mechanical or manual emptying of faecal sludge from onsite sanitation systems, and transportation of waste to the treatment facilities using road-based equipment. There are several combinations of transportation technologies and fixed infrastructure that can be used within FSM service delivery.

FSM is often highlighted as an affordable, sustainable and viable technical solution for safe and proper management of faecal sludge, and over the years it has been praised in the literature emphasizing the its potential for meeting the global sanitation challenge. However, there are several limitations related to data, tools and practical examples to support decision makers in the implementation of FSM services.

Ruth Kennedy-Walker and colleagues presented new research recently published in Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology discussing faecal sludge management options for two informal settlements in Lusaka, The Republic of Zambia.

Informal settlements important in sanitation management

Over 60% of the inhabitants in Lusaka live in informal settlements, meaning that sanitation provision via conventional sewerage, onsite septic tanks or formalized FSM services are available only to mid- and high-income residents inhabiting the planned areas of the city. Low income areas have little or no sanitation provision, and large sectors of the city have inadequate infrastructure for meeting the sanitation needs of the population.

Figure 1. Map of Lusaka, capital of The Republic of Zambia. The case study areas, the informal settlements Chazanga and Kanyama, are highlighted with a thick silhouette. The map also shows the existing sewerage network and the community boundaries. Only 9 of the 21 informal settlements in Lusaka are provisioned by the formal sewerage network (Image: Kennedy-Walker et al., 2015).

Evaluating the long-term costs and tools for optimization

This new study addresses some of the issues in sector limitations by presenting a long-term costing methodology for two of the informal settlements in Lusaka. The methodology compares the costs related to a number of feasible fixed infrastructure and transportation scenarios over a 25 year period. The spatio-topological tool developed by the researchers in their analysis was used to model proposed FSM networks – allowing the path of least-time transportation to be identified.

This was used for calculating the net present value and average incremental cost for seven different FSM scenarios over a 25 year design life. The research demonstrated that FSM can be considered an affordable solution for providing sanitation services to the poorest communities of Lusaka. This is valuable information for planners in Lusaka as a decision-support tool, but also very beneficial to the entire sanitation sector.

Clean water and sanitation fundamental for Sustainable Development

Figure 2. The sixth Sustainable Development Goal of total 17: Availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation (Image from UN.org).

Since 2010, the United Nations General Assembly recognized the human right to water and sanitation, acknowledging that sanitation and clean drinking water are crucial to the realization of all human rights (Resolution A/RES/64/292).

Ensuring availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all is one of the recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). The SDG have certain targets to achieve by 2030, for instance:

  • Equitable and universal access to safe and affordable drinking water for all.
  • Access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene, with a special attention to the needs of girls, women and those in vulnerable situations.
  • Improvement of water quality by reducing pollution, eliminating dumping and minimizing release of hazardous chemicals and materials, halving the proportion of untreated wastewater and substantially increasing recycling and safe reuse globally.

By developing tools that are applicable to the sanitation community in general, the study from Kennedy-Walker and colleagues provides important knowledge and methods for communities and societies that are in need of proper sludge management, especially for those in vulnerable situations such as informal settlements. This can be seen as one of the many steps required to achieve our goal of proper sanitation for all.


Read this exciting research for free* by clicking the link below:

Optimisation and costing of faecal sludge management options for Lusakas’ informal settlements
R. Kennedy-Walker, T. Holderness, D. Aldersson, J. M. Amezaga and C. A. Paterson
Env. Sci: Water res. Technol
. 2016, Advance Article.
DOI: 10.1039/C5EW00179J

—————-

About the webwriter

Jesper Agrelius is a MSc student in Environmental Science at Linköping University, Sweden. His main interests regards environmental science, especially climate change and biogeochemistry. You can follow him on Twitter @JesperAgrelius.

—————-

*Access is free through a registered RSC account.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology Most Accessed Articles 2015

These are the top 10 most downloaded articles published in Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology in 2015. Congratulations to all of the authors whose articles have been featured!

Microbial capacitive desalination for integrated organic matter and salt removal and energy production from unconventional natural gas produced water
Casey Forrestal, Zachary Stoll, Pei Xu and Zhiyong Jason Ren
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol.
, 2015,1, 47-55
DOI: 10.1039/C4EW00050A

Bioelectrochemical systems for nitrogen removal and recovery from wastewater
M. Rodríguez Arredondo, P. Kuntke, A. W. Jeremiasse, T. H. J. A. Sleutels, C. J. N. Buisman and A. ter Heijne
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015,1, 22-33
DOI: 10.1039/C4EW00066H

Pitfalls and progress: a perspective on achieving sustainable sanitation for all
Michael R. Templeton
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015,1, 17-21
DOI: 10.1039/C4EW00087K

Reduction of microbial contamination from drinking water using an iron oxide nanoparticle-impregnated ultrafiltration mixed matrix membrane: preparation, characterization and antimicrobial properties
Munmun Mukherjee and Sirshendu De
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol.
, 2015,1, 204-217
DOI: 10.1039/C4EW00094C

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures ranging from 15 °C to 3 °C
A. L. Smith, S. J. Skerlos and L. Raskin
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol.
, 2015,1, 56-64
DOI: 10.1039/C4EW00070F

The water energy food nexus – challenges and emerging solutions
John Machell, Kevin Prior, Richard Allan and John M. Andresen
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015,1, 15-16
DOI: 10.1039/C4EW90001D

Detection of trace arsenic in drinking water: challenges and opportunities for microfluidics
Nevetha Yogarajah and Scott S. H. Tsai
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015,1, 426-447
DOI: 10.1039/C5EW00099H

Graphene in the Fe3O4 nano-composite switching the negative influence of humic acid coating into an enhancing effect in the removal of arsenic from water
Blain Paul, Vyom Parashar and Ajay Mishra
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015,1, 77-83
DOI: 10.1039/C4EW00034J

Selective adsorption of oil–water mixtures using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)–graphene sponges
Diana N. H. Tran, Shervin Kabiri, Ting Rui Sim and Dusan Losic
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015,1, 298-305
DOI: 10.1039/C5EW00035A

Adsorptive removal of arsenic from groundwater using a novel high flux polyacrylonitrile (PAN)–laterite mixed matrix ultrafiltration membrane
Somak Chatterjee and Sirshendu De
Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol.
, 2015,1, 227-243
DOI: 10.1039/C4EW00075G




Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Emerging Investigators Series author: Patrick McNamara

Patrick McNamaraPatrick McNamara is in his third year as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering at Marquette University. His research group focuses on the removal of micropollutants from water, wastewater, and biosolids, and on the interactions between microbial communities and micropollutants with a special emphasis on antibiotic resistance. He earned his PhD in 2012 from the University of Minnesota under the guidance of Paige Novak and his MS in 2008 from the University of Texas at Austin with Des Lawler.

Read Patrick’s Emerging Investigators article ‘Pyrolysis removes common microconstituents triclocarban, triclosan, and nonylphenol from biosolids’ here.



How has your research evolved from your first to your most recent article?
My first work was on the dewaterability of wastewater biosolids. I worked for a physical-chemical treatment expert while earning my master’s, but was drawn to the biological aspects of anaerobic digestion. I grew interested in the interactions between micropollutants and anaerobic treatment processes. My research group now focuses on the impacts of micropollutants in biological systems and investigates ways to remove micropollutants. This most recent article looked at a process to remove micropollutants from biosolids.

– What aspect of your work are you most excited about at the moment?
I am very enthusiastic about our work on consumer product antimicrobials and antibiotic resistance. We have made some interesting findings at Marquette in this area and it will be a fun journey to continue to dive deeper. I am thrilled about a new postdoctoral scholar joining us in January to work in this area, and I am looking to have a PhD student join us in this area as well.

– What was your biggest challenge during this research?
John Ross was my first graduate student. He walked into a lab without established procedures or even an LC-MS at the time. It was a big, but fun challenge to get everything started. John took a risk working for a starting Assistant Professor, but we had a great experience learning from each other. The biggest lab challenge was keeping the reactor system air-tight after multiple experiments.

– How did you find out about Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology?
From David Cwiertny on Twitter! ES:WR&T does a great job getting its name out there on social media, and then the name spreads quickly between colleagues in the field because they put together a great editorial team.

– What are your views on the Environmental Science journals of the Royal Society of Chemistry?
This is my first experience publishing in an Environmental Science journal from the Royal Society of Chemistry. It was terrific. The process was so smooth and clear. The turn-around time was almost unbelievable. They are publishing on a lot of hot topics.

– In which upcoming conferences or events may our readers meet you?
I plan to attend this summer’s Gordon conference on Environmental Sciences: Water. I was also invited to talk at ASM Microbe 2016 that will be held in Boston in June.

– How do you spend your spare time?
I enjoy walks with my wife, going to Marquette Basketball games, fishing, playing piano, traveling, and having coffee or a beer with friends.

– If you could not be a scientist, but could be anything else, what would you be?
Well, with no restrictions I would be a professional soccer player or piano player in a band. But honestly, I cannot believe I get to do this job, I love it.

– Can you share one piece of career-related advice or wisdom with other early career scientists?
Find a mentor, and take advice from people in your field that you respect both scientifically and personally. Don’t be seduced by the people who talk about how they are always working; they might just have poor time management. This is the best job in the world. Do your job well, and take breaks at the end of the day and on weekends. It’s a marathon, but it can be very fun and rewarding. Lastly, learn to delegate and trust others after you have taught them. It is hard to be successful if you need to do everything on your own. Teamwork is very valuable.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Improving oil retrieval methods

Environmental impacts of oil spills

Accidental oil spills are unavoidable during the acquisition, processing and distribution of petroleum products. Oil can pollute the oceans through a range of processes, such as land run off, tanker discharges and vessel accidents. Oil spills impact humans, plants and wildlife, including fish, mammals and birds.

In many cases, the environmental recovery after an oil spill is fairly swift and complete within ten years; however, some long-term environmental effects can be measured decades after a large oil spill.

Oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico, April 29th 2010 (Image from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)

Oil spill remediation techniques

Remediation techniques to manage oil spills are often both expensive and lengthy. Conventional clean-up techniques after oil spills range from in situ burning; mechanical methods, such as booms, vacuums and skimming; chemical dispersants; and/or the use of sorbent materials. Each of these methods presents its own advantages and disadvantages depending on the scenario of the oil spill.

One of the most versatile, cost effective and fruitful methods is to use porous sorbent materials to remove oil from the water surface. We can find natural oil sorbents such as wood, cotton, milkweed, and wool, among others. The efficiency of the sorbent material is related to its hydrophobicity, porosity, sorption capacity and rate, and reusability.

Each oil remediation technique comes with its own environmental impact. Many novel synthetic oil sorbents are currently being developed and there is great need for biodegradable and reusable absorbents to manage oil spills – and to minimize the environmental effect of the oil remediation technique.

New methods to separate oil and water: biodegradable synthetic oil sorbent

A study from Boston University recently published in Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology presents knowledge on biodegradable synthetic oil sorbents, allowing for efficient recovery after accidental oil spills.

Electrospun non-woven poly(ε-carporlactone) PCL microfiber meshes are mechanically robust, reusable and biodegradable polymeric oil sorbents capable of  retrieving oil from oil spills in both freshwater and seawater.

Schematic diagram of an electrospun hydrophobic PCL mesh that selectively removes oil from a water-in-oil emulsion.

By simulating oil spills in fresh- and seawater scenarios, researchers examined how well the polymeric oil sorbent could retrieve oil. The PCL is hydrophobic and has >99.5% (oil over water) oil selectivity and has oil absorption capacities of approx. 10 grams of oil/gram of sorbent material. Both the absorption capacity and the oil selectivity remained constant over several oil absorption and vacuum assisted retrieval cycles when removing crude oil or mechanical pump oil.

This study shows the need for biodegradable synthetic oil sorbents which balance porosity and mechanical integrity enabling reuse, and allowing for efficient recovery of oil after an oil spill.


Interested in this research? You can read the full paper for free* using the link below:

Poly(ε-caprolactone) microfiber meshes for repeated oil retrieval
J.S Hersey, S.T Yohe and M. W. Grinstaff
Env. Sci: Water Res. Technol. 2015, 1, 779-786
DOI: 10.1039/C5EW00107B

—————-

About the webwriter

Jesper Agrelius is a MSc student in Environmental Science at Linköping University, Sweden. His main interests regards environmental science, especially climate change and biogeochemistry. You can follow him on Twitter @JesperAgrelius.

—————-

*Access is free through a registered RSC account – click here to register

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)